cryptocurrency

Trump corruption with a devil shadow

Originally published June 7, 2025. Rewritten and expanded August 29, 2026.

Asked in January what he had learned since returning to office, the president gave the most honest answer of his second term. “I found out that nobody cared.”

He was talking to the New York Times about the guardrails β€” the ethics norms, the disclosure regimes, the quaint idea that a president shouldn’t be selling things. Nobody cared. So he stopped pretending. In July, asked on CNBC about the billion-plus dollars his family has pulled out of crypto ventures his own administration regulates, he said “there’s nothing illegal, there’s nothing wrong with it,” and volunteered that his children have “inside information” on “almost anything they do” by virtue of the presidency. He has bragged about killing the investigations into his own industry: “You’re lucky I’m president!”

That is the tone now. Not denial. Not deflection. Ownership.

For years, Republican lawmakers and right-wing media outlets frothed at the mouth over Hunter Biden’s laptop and fabricated tales of Burisma “corruption” β€” stories so thoroughly debunked that the FBI informant who invented them, Alexander Smirnov, went to prison for his lies. The GOP knew the Burisma bribes were fake Russian disinformation from the start, yet they weaponized these fabrications to launch impeachment proceedings and relentlessly smear the Biden family. Meanwhile, they’ve maintained a deafening silence about the brazen, documented, and ongoing Trump corruption stench emanating from the convicted fraudster‘s second presidency. Maryland Representative and House Judiciary ranking member Jamie Raskin called it a “gangster state.” And that was before the president chartered his own bank.

The hypocrisy is breathtaking in its audacity. While Republicans manufactured outrage over phantom millions supposedly flowing to the Bidens β€” money that never existed, deals that never happened, corruption that was entirely fictional β€” they’ve turned a blind eye to the very real, very documented flood of cash pouring into Trump’s coffers from foreign governments, cryptocurrency schemes, and pay-to-play access deals that would make a banana republic dictator blush.

What follows is not speculation, not innuendo, not the fever dreams of political opponents. This is a meticulously documented catalog of corruption so vast and shameless that it dwarfs anything previously seen in American presidential history. And the numbers have changed by an order of magnitude since I first wrote this list. In June 2025 the headline figures were $346 million across two inaugural committees and a $400 million airplane. Fifteen months later: $1.4 billion in cryptocurrency income booked on his own sworn financial disclosure, a single month with 1,051 trades in his personal brokerage accounts, a federal bank charter granted to his family’s crypto firm by a comptroller he appointed, and roughly $1 billion drained out of the National Park Service to pay for monuments to himself. The presidency has been converted into a personal ATM with all the subtlety of a smash-and-grab robbery, and the alarm has been disconnected.

The Teapot Dome Scandal of the 1920s served as the quintessential symbol of government corruption for decades — over a mere $7 million worth of bribes to Interior Secretary Albert Fall. It was eclipsed and replaced by Watergate, shortly preceded by the resignation of Vice President Spiro Agnew over the discovery of his $300,000 operation that funneled cash stuffed into plain envelopes by bag men into the White House. Trump’s corruption represents a quantum leap beyond even these watershed moments in terms of sheer orders of magnitude, as well as the brazen manner in which the heists are being conducted in broad daylight.

The same party that spent years screaming about imaginary Ukrainian energy company bribes and fantasy Chinese business deals has remained conspicuously silent as their standard-bearer openly auctions off American foreign policy, drops federal investigations for donors, and literally sells dinner invitations for millions of dollars. The cognitive dissonance would be comical if it weren’t so dangerous to our democracy.

What is an example of political corruption in the United States? You cannot find a bigger collection of brazen examples. This is the story they don’t want you to focus on β€” the real corruption, the documented grift, the unprecedented monetization of the American presidency happening right before our eyes. Here is where it stands as of late August 2026.

1. The President’s Own Brokerage Account

This is the newest theater and the hardest one to explain away, because the documents are signed by him.

  • On August 22, 2026, the Office of Government Ethics released the president’s periodic transaction report for June. One month. 1,051 transactions, worth between $78.1 million and $263.1 million. He signed it himself on August 12.
  • An index fund is one line on a disclosure. That is the whole test. On May 15, 2026, Eric Trump said on X that the family’s assets were “invested in a blind trust by the largest financial institutions in broad market indexes.” Four days later a Trump Organization spokesperson told the New York Times the family has no “role in selecting, directing, approving, influencing or soliciting specific investments.” The White House now says the accounts run on “computer-based model portfolios that automatically replicate recognized indexes, such as the Schwab 1000.” Those are not the same explanation. Broad-market index funds produce single line items; direct index replication produces thousands of individual trades. Both cannot be true, and across four months and three explanations nobody has named a single manager.
  • The June filing shows a purchase of $15,001 to $50,000 of SpaceX on June 23 β€” eleven days after the company priced the largest IPO in American history at a $1.77 trillion valuation. Algorithms replicating an index do not get in line for an IPO allocation.
  • The same filing shows Palantir sold twice in June β€” including up to $1 million on June 18 β€” and bought three times, including $100,001 to $250,000 on June 24. On August 4, Deputy Secretary of Defense Steve Feinberg signed a memo directing up to $243.9 million to Palantir without competitive bidding.
  • Ten days before the filing dropped, Senator Elizabeth Warren and Rep. Robert Garcia sent the president a 17-page letter enumerating more than 30 transactions that overlap official government actions, each footnoted to a row number in his own filing and a specific .gov announcement. The hard, primary-source counts from his own filings are 3,555 transactions in the first quarter of 2026 and 1,051 in June β€” an average approaching fifty trades for every day the markets were open, which is more trading than all 535 members of Congress did in 2025 combined. (The letter also cites an outside analysis putting 2025 at more than 14,000 trades worth up to $1.06 billion; Bloomberg’s tally of the same filing says 21,000. Those are estimates, not filing counts, and they should not be blended.)
  • A sample of the overlaps: a purchase of up to $5 million in Axon Enterprise roughly two weeks before ICE posted a $220 million contract notice for some 17,800 Tasers written to a specification only Axon can meet. Purchases of NVIDIA and AMD on January 6, shortly before the administration announced changes easing chip sales to China. Four purchases across BNY Mellon and Robinhood in March, before Treasury designated BNY as the government’s financial agent for the Trump Accounts program and Robinhood as its trustee.
  • Their deadline for answers was August 28, 2026.
Continue reading Trump corruption tracker
Read more

David Sacks in a Bitcoin suit

David Sacks: Silicon Valley’s Political Power Player

At the intersection of technology, venture capital, and right-wing politics, the star of tech mogul David Sacks has risen prominently in recent years. From PayPal executive to Trump’s AI & Crypto Czar, Sacks represents a new breed of tech tycoon whose influence extends far beyond Silicon Valley boardrooms into the corridors of political power.

From South Africa to Silicon Valley

Born on May 25, 1972, in Cape Town, South Africa, Sacks followed a path that would eventually lead him to become one of the most influential entrepreneurs in American tech. After immigrating to the United States, he received his education at the University of Chicago Law School, graduating in 1998.

His Silicon Valley journey began in earnest when he joined PayPal in 1999 as Chief Operating Officer. At PayPal, Sacks was instrumental in building key teams and oversaw product management, sales, and marketing functions. This early chapter placed him squarely within what would later be known as the “PayPal Mafia” – a legendary group of executives including Peter Thiel and Elon Musk who went on to found and fund numerous successful tech ventures.

Entrepreneurial Success

Following PayPal’s $1.5 billion acquisition by eBay in 2002, Sacks embarked on a remarkable entrepreneurial journey:

  • He briefly ventured into Hollywood, producing the critically acclaimed film “Thank You for Smoking” and later “DalΓ­land”
  • In 2008, he founded Yammer, an enterprise social networking service that was acquired by Microsoft for $1.2 billion just four years later
  • As an angel investor, he made early bets on Facebook, Uber, SpaceX, and Airbnb, cementing his reputation for identifying transformative companies
  • In 2017, Sacks co-founded Craft Ventures, a venture capital firm focused on SaaS and marketplace models that has become a significant player in tech investing

His entrepreneurial success positioned him as a respected voice in Silicon Valley, with insights that extended from product development to company building and investment strategy.

The Twitter Chapter: Musk’s Right-Hand Man

One of the most notable recent chapters in Sacks’ career has been his involvement with Twitter (now X) during and after Elon Musk’s controversial acquisition of the platform in 2022. As part of Musk’s inner circle, Sacks played a pivotal role in advising on the company’s transition.

Continue reading Who is David Sacks?
Read more

Elon Musk as a clown

Effective Altruism and Longtermism are relatively recent (since the late 2000s) twin philosophical movements making the claim that, as a human species, we ought to prioritize impacting the long-term future of humanity — hundreds, thousands, or millions of years from now — over and above any concerns for actual humans alive today. Largely inspired by utilitarianism, it favors questionable metrics like “lives saved per dollar” in its quest to not just do good, but “do the most good.”

Longtermism is an outgrowth of Effective Altruism (EA), a social movement developed by philosophers Peter Singer and William MacAskill. It emphasizes the moral importance of trying to shape the far future, and adherents argue that the long-term consequences of our actions far outweigh their short-term effects because of the potential of vast numbers of future lives. In other words, future people will outnumber us at such a scale that, by comparison to this imaginary future universe, our current-day lives are not very important at all.

It has numerous and powerful adherents among the Silicon Valley elite including Trump bromance Elon Musk, tech billionaire Peter Thiel (who spoke at the RNC in 2016), indicted and disgraced crypto trader Sam Bankman-Fried, Twitter and Square founder Jack Dorsey (who is good friends with Elon), OpenAI‘s CEO Sam Altman, Ethereum founder (and Thiel fellow) Vitalik Buterin, co-founder of Asana Dustin Moskovitz, and others.

Why longtermism resonates with tech oligarchs

The tech-industrial complex is steeped in the idea of longtermism in part because it aligns so well with so many of their values:

  • technological optimism / techno-utopianism — the belief that technology is the solution to all of humanity’s greatest challenges
  • risk-taking mindset — venture capital is famous for its high-risk, high-reward mentality
  • Greatness Thinking — unwavering devotion to an Ayn Randian worldview in which only two groups exist: a small group of otherworldly titans, and everyone else
  • atomized world — social groups and historical context don’t matter much, because one’s personal individualized contributions are what make real impact on the world

The dubious ethics of effective altruism

Although it positions itself high, high above the heady clouds of moral superiority, EA is yet another in a long line of elaborate excuses for ignoring urgent problems we actually face, in favor of “reallocating resources” towards some long-distant predictively “better” class of people that do not currently exist and will not exist for thousands, millions, or even billions of years. It’s an elaborate excuse framework for “billionaires behaving badly” — who claim to be akin to saints or even gods who are doing the difficult work of “saving humanity,” but in reality are navel-gazing into their vanity projects and stroking each others’ raging narcissism while completely ignoring large, looming actual dangers in the here and now like climate change, systemic inequality, and geopolitical instabillity to name a few.

Continue reading Effective Altruism and Longtermism: Twin ideologies driving tech billionaires
Read more