RWAs

Right wing groups in America have long wielded disproportionate influence over political discourse, policy-making, and the judiciary — quietly but effectively steering the country toward a more authoritarian, corporate-driven agenda. Groups like the Federalist Society and Heritage Foundation operate as power brokers in the conservative ecosystem, funneling money and influence to shape not just elections, but the ideological future of the nation.

The Federalist Society, for example, has become a judicial kingmaker, successfully installing justices on the Supreme Court who subscribe to its narrow view of constitutional “originalism”—leading to landmark decisions like Dobbs v. Jackson, which rolled back reproductive rights in America. Meanwhile, Heritage’s Project 2025 serves as a blueprint for a far-right authoritarian takeover of federal agencies, ready to gut progressive reforms and install Christian nationalist ideology in their place.

But these are just a few key players in an ever-expanding web of right-wing groups. The National Rifle Association (NRA) remains a force in stoking fears around gun rights to mobilize voters, while Fox News continues to manipulate public discourse with fear-mongering and disinformation to drive its viewers further into a reactionary worldview. Behind the scenes, the Council for National Policy (CNP) operates as a shadowy network of conservative elites pulling the strings, and groups like the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) and Turning Point USA drive extremist policies at the state and grassroots levels.

Add to that the influence of organizations like the Family Research Council, Focus on the Family, and PragerU, and it becomes clear that right-wing power in America is deeply entrenched, feeding off the fear and division these groups systematically create. The stakes for democracy and the future of civil liberties couldn’t be higher.

One way to address the threat is to become familiar with it. Here is a cheatsheet to some of the most influential and notable right wing groups in operation today.

The Federalist Society

The Federalist Society is a powerful, right-wing legal organization that seeks to reshape the U.S. judiciary by advocating for originalism and textualism—the interpretation of the Constitution based on its supposedly “original” meaning (as interpreted by conservative judges, of course). Founded in 1982, this group has steadily gained influence by grooming conservative legal talent, promoting judges who share their philosophy, and challenging progressive legislation, with many of its members appointed to federal courts, including the Supreme Court.

Their ultimate goal is to roll back decades of civil rights protections, environmental regulations, and reproductive freedoms in favor of limited government (even ultra-limited government) and deregulated markets. Now led by conservative activist Leonard Leo, The Federalist Society’s growing clout can be seen in the success of getting their chosen justices onto the Supreme Court, paving the way for decisions like Dobbs v. Jackson, which overturned Roe v. Wade and set back reproductive rights in America by half a century. The organization’s influence has been particularly notable during Republican administrations, especially under former President Donald Trump, who appointed 3 of the Court’s 9 straight from the Federalist list.

A full two thirds of the current U.S. Supreme Court justices have been affiliated with or supported by The Federalist Society. These justices share the Society’s commitment to originalism and textualism, and many were recommended or championed by the organization during the judicial nomination process. The following 6 justices have ties to The Federalist Society:

  1. John Roberts (Chief Justice) – Although not a formal member, Roberts has participated in Federalist Society events and has been described as ideologically aligned with the group’s principles.
  2. Clarence Thomas – An advocate of originalism, Thomas has long been associated with the judicial philosophy promoted by The Federalist Society. He has spoken at their events and is widely seen as one of their intellectual leaders on the bench.
  3. Samuel Alito – Like Roberts, Alito is not a formal member but has participated in Federalist Society activities and shares their conservative judicial outlook.
  4. Neil Gorsuch – A formal member of The Federalist Society before his nomination, Gorsuch was strongly backed by the organization when he was selected to replace Antonin Scalia in 2017.
  5. Brett Kavanaugh – Kavanaugh was supported by The Federalist Society throughout his career, and his nomination to the Supreme Court in 2018 was actively promoted by the group.
  6. Amy Coney Barrett – A former member of The Federalist Society, Barrett was a professor at Notre Dame Law School, where she worked closely with the organization. She was nominated to the Supreme Court in 2020 to replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

The Heritage Foundation

The Heritage Foundation, founded in 1973, has long been a key architect of conservative policy in the United States. The Foundation’s efforts consistently push for policies that prioritize corporate interests, deregulation, and concentrated executive power, even at the expense of democratic institutions and processes.

Over the decades, The Heritage Foundation has become a significant force in shaping Republican legislative agendas, providing policy proposals to GOP lawmakers and conservative administrations since Ronald Reagan. However, this institutional influence has often facilitated the entrenchment of an authoritarian strain of right-wing ideology that has now metasticized into the body politic.

Heritage’s agenda has become increasingly anti-democratic in its pursuit of power. Its advocacy for dismantling federal agencies, weakening regulatory oversight, and limiting social safety nets often serves to entrench economic inequality and undermine the role of government in protecting vulnerable populations.

Furthermore, Heritage’s opposition to climate change action, LGBTQ+ rights, and healthcare reform is reflective of a broader ideological commitment to a reactionary social order. By aligning itself with powerful corporate donors and influential media allies, The Heritage Foundation plays a critical role in driving an agenda that marginalizes progressive movements and fosters an increasingly polarized political environment.

Project 2025

Project 2025, one of The Heritage Foundation’s most concerning initiatives, is emblematic of its deeper authoritarian aspirations. Framed as a “presidential transition” plan for the next conservative administration (it features Donald Trump’s name some 312 times in the document), Project 2025 offers a detailed blueprint to swiftly take control of the federal government. It is not simply a roadmap for policy but a systematic effort to capture and reshape the bureaucratic state.

The project outlines a strategy for staffing key government agencies with loyalists (and preferably sycophants), ensuring that the next administration can immediately implement an aggressive conservative agenda. This emphasis on bureaucratic control, along with Heritage’s advocacy for executive power, represents a clear threat to democratic governance and the system of checks and balances architected so carefully by the Framers.

In many ways, Project 2025 is less about policy and more about consolidating power. By installing ideologically aligned personnel across government agencies, the project seeks to neutralize resistance from career civil servants and diminish the ability of future administrations to enact progressive reforms. This long-term strategy of bureaucratic entrenchment and executive dominance is a direct challenge to democratic norms and the American principle of governance for the common good.

The Heritage Foundation, through Project 2025, reveals its broader mission: not just to win elections, but to reshape the machinery of government itself in the image of its authoritarian vision. It’s a blueprint for dismantling the administrative state and concentrating power among a select few.

National Rifle Association (NRA)

The National Rifle Association (NRA) is far more than just a gun rights advocacy group—it’s a political powerhouse that has masterfully weaponized the Second Amendment to push a broader right-wing agenda for years. With deep ties to conservative politicians and a well-oiled lobbying machine, the NRA’s influence extends far beyond the realm of firearms.

Over the decades, it has systematically reframed the gun debate as an existential battle for “freedom,” distorting the conversation around personal liberty while sidestepping the horrific realities of mass shootings and gun violence. By wrapping their cause in the flag and positioning themselves as defenders of constitutional rights, the NRA has successfully blocked nearly every attempt at even modest gun control reforms, no matter how devastating the consequences.

Behind the scenes, the NRA has also served as a financial and ideological conduit for far-right causes, aligning itself with libertarian, Christian nationalist, and white nationalist factions in the U.S. and abroad. Their messaging, amplified through donations, media campaigns, and rallies, often serves as a rallying cry for those who fear a changing demographic and cultural landscape.

In this context, the NRA’s defense of gun ownership morphs into a broader crusade against progressive ideals, becoming a tool to mobilize voters around fear, racial resentment, and conspiracy theories about government overreach. While the group’s finances and leadership have recently been rocked by scandal including the departure of longtime head Wayne LaPierre, the NRA remains a critical node in the conservative ecosystem, helping to fuel America’s increasing polarization and resistance to meaningful reform.

Fox News

Fox News has perfected the art of outrage, transforming itself from a news channel into a megaphone for right-wing populism and conservative grievance politics. More than just a media outlet, Fox has become the central nervous system of the conservative movement, shaping public discourse by peddling a mix of hyper-partisan news, conspiracy theories, and fear-based rhetoric — to resounding profits, defamation suits notwithstanding.

With personalities like Sean Hannity and former performer Tucker Carlson leading the charge, the network has managed to inflame racial, cultural, and political divisions while reinforcing a narrative of “us vs. them” that keeps its audience in a state of perpetual anger and distrust. The goal is clear: to command attention, retain viewers, and push the Overton window ever further to the right, all while raking in massive profits.

Fox News also operates as an informal arm of the Republican Party, serving as both a testing ground for policy ideas and a propaganda machine for GOP candidates. From promoting baseless claims of election fraud to downplaying public health crises like COVID-19, the network consistently distorts reality and joins in the Big Lies to fit its ideological goals.

This symbiotic relationship between Fox and conservative power brokers helps create an ecosystem where facts are malleable, and ideological loyalty trumps journalistic integrity. At the same time, its influence spreads beyond television screens, seeping into social media, right-wing radio, and political rhetoric, amplifying its impact and ensuring that its brand of populist nationalism remains deeply entrenched in American political culture.

Council for National Policy (CNP)

The Council for National Policy (CNP) is an ultra-secretive, right-wing organization that wields immense influence over conservative politics in the U.S., yet few outside the political sphere are even aware of its existence. Comprised of high-profile conservative activists, donors, media moguls, and religious leaders, the CNP acts as a behind-the-scenes power broker, shaping Republican strategy and policy far from the public eye.

Its members, who include Christian nationalists, anti-abortion activists, and climate change deniers, work to advance a deeply conservative agenda aimed at reshaping America according to their ideological vision—one where Christian values dominate public life, government regulations are gutted, and progressive social reforms are rolled back.

Operating in the shadows, the CNP is a master of political influence, often acting as the connective tissue between think tanks, media organizations, and grassroots movements (or, more likely, astroturfed movements). Its influence can be seen in the rise of candidates who espouse extremist views, the promotion of climate skepticism, and coordinated efforts to undermine voting rights and democratic norms.

The group’s meetings are closed to the public, but its fingerprints are evident in the far-right policies being enacted across state legislatures and at the federal level. While their operations remain mostly hidden, the CNP’s agenda is clear: to push America toward a future that aligns with a deeply conservative, Christian nationalist ideology, regardless of the cost to democratic institutions or the broader public good.

Right Wing Groups

In addition to the above heavyweights, a whole horde of other right-embracing organizations are out there working towards anti-democratic ends. We are actively updating this list over time, so please stay tuned for additional right wing groups research to come (or TKTK, as we say in the biz).

Active ClubSimilar to Patriot Front, Active Club emphasizes creating a white nationalist counterculture where young men are socialized into adopting the group’s racist politics. It has risen to prominence with 12 chapters as of the latest reports.
Alliance Defending Freedomformerly the Alliance Defense Fund:

Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) is a conservative Christian legal advocacy organization founded in 1994. ADF focuses on defending religious freedom, the sanctity of life, freedom of speech, and traditional family values through litigation, legal training, and advocacy. The organization provides legal representation and support in cases related to these issues, often taking on high-profile cases that challenge laws or policies perceived as infringing on religious rights or promoting progressive social agendas. ADF has been involved in numerous significant legal battles in the United States, including cases before the Supreme Court, where it has advocated for the rights of individuals and organizations to act according to their religious beliefs. The organization is widely recognized as a leading force in the legal defense of conservative Christian values.
America First Legal FoundationOrganization connected to Trump advisors Stephen Miller and Mark Meadows, involved in both the fake electors scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 election and backing the “independent state legislature doctrine” arguments in favor of extreme partisan gerrymandering to keep GOP power concentrated in state legislatures.
America’s Frontline DoctorsAmerica’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) is a controversial conservative group founded in 2020 by Dr. Simone Gold, during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. The organization gained national attention for promoting unproven and often discredited treatments for COVID-19, such as hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, while downplaying the severity of the virus and opposing public health measures like mask mandates and vaccinations. AFLDS positioned itself as a counter-narrative to mainstream medical and scientific advice, claiming to advocate for medical freedom and patient rights. The group’s activities and messaging have been widely criticized by public health experts, medical professionals, and government agencies for spreading misinformation and contributing to vaccine hesitancy. Despite this, AFLDS has maintained a significant following among certain segments of the population that are skeptical of conventional medical advice and government interventions.
America’s FutureMike Flynn-connected org involved in both the fake electors scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 election in Donald Trump’s favor, and legal support for the “independent state legislatures doctrine” arguing for extreme state gerrymandering to concentrate state power in GOP hands.
American Conservative Union (ACU)The American Conservative Union (ACU) is a prominent conservative advocacy organization in the United States, founded in 1964. It is best known for hosting the annual Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC), which brings together conservative activists, policymakers, and leaders to discuss and promote conservative values and policies. The ACU also engages in political lobbying, voter education, and the rating of politicians based on their adherence to conservative principles. The organization plays a significant role in shaping the conservative agenda in American politics, with a focus on issues such as limited government, free markets, individual liberties, and traditional values.
American Federation for ChildrenTax-free organization funded by Betsy DeVos that lobbies to divert funding away from public schools and to private Christian charter schools.
American Future FundThe fund describes itself as providing Americans with “a conservative and free market viewpoint” with the means to communicate and advocate on behalf of those beliefs.[7] In 2010, the fund reported over 9 million dollars of independent campaign expenditures to the Federal Election Commission, and all of its expenditures benefited Republicans.
American Heritage Girlsthe right-wing “shadow version” of the Girl Scouts, that splintered off after the organization allowed scouts to substitute for the word ‘God’ if they so chose, in the Girl Scout Promise.

AHG is a ‘Christ-centered organization’ that requires members to make statements of faith.
American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC)Along with CNP, one of two primary right-wing groups with deep funding ties over the past half century to Republican lawmakers and donors & covertly driving “local” and state legislative agenda centrally from a nationally-coordinated source that shrinks from public view and carefully shields its operations from scrutiny.
American MajorityAn organization supported by the Uihleins that provides training to conservative activists.
American Phoenix ProjectAccording to the indictment, Hostetter founded a group in 2020 called the American Phoenix Project that protested restrictions on public gatherings imposed as a public health measure during the COVID-19 pandemic. That group became a platform to advocate violence against government leaders, according to the indictment.
American Principles Projecta right-wing anti-abortion and anti-free elections think tank
Americans for ProsperityAs the Koch brothers’ primary political advocacy group, it is one of the most influential American conservative organizations.
Americas PACAnother closely-tied super PAC, Americas PAC, received $1 million from Restoration Action and about $1.4 million from Restoration PAC in 2021. During the 2020 cycle, Americas PAC was funded mostly by Uihlein’s $2.35 million in contributions. During the following cycle, its funding shifted from Uihlein to Restoration PAC and Restoration Action, effectively adding an extra layer of insulation between Uihlein and the super PAC.
Arlington GroupThe Arlington Group is a coalition of influential conservative Christian leaders and organizations in the United States, formed in 2002. The group focuses on coordinating strategies to influence public policy and elections in favor of conservative, often evangelical Christian, values. Members of the Arlington Group include leaders from various Christian advocacy organizations, think tanks, and political action committees. The coalition primarily addresses issues such as opposition to abortion, the defense of traditional marriage, and the promotion of religious freedom. The Arlington Group is known for its behind-the-scenes efforts to shape Republican Party platforms and support candidates who align with its values, playing a significant role in the broader conservative movement in America.
Aryan NationsAryan Nations is a white supremacist, neo-Nazi organization founded in the 1970s. It has been involved in promoting white nationalism and has a history of criminal activity and violence.
Big Oil: oil and gas industrynatural habitat for Dominionist theology:
* Texas
* Louisiana
* Kansas
* Oklahoma
California Family CouncilThe California Family Council (CFC) is a conservative Christian organization dedicated to promoting and defending traditional family values in California. Founded in 2003, CFC works to influence public policy and legislation from a biblical perspective, focusing on issues such as opposition to abortion, the defense of traditional marriage, and the promotion of religious freedom. The organization engages in grassroots advocacy, public education, and lobbying efforts, aiming to shape state laws and cultural attitudes in line with its conservative Christian beliefs. CFC also collaborates with other like-minded organizations to amplify its impact on California’s social and political landscape.
Center for Renewing AmericaChristian nationalist organization led by Russell Vought, with a focus on “combating” Critical Race Theory:

Vought sees his and his organization’s mission as “renew[ing] a consensus of America as a nation under God,” per a statement on CRA’s website, and reshaping the government’s contract with the governed. Freedom of religion would remain a protected right, but Vought and his ideological brethren would not shy from using their administration positions to promote Christian doctrine and imbue public policy with it, according to both people familiar with the matter, granted anonymity to avoid retaliation. He makes clear reference to human rights being defined by God, not man.

America should be recognized as a Christian nation “where our rights and duties are understood to come from God,” Vought wrote two years ago in Newsweek.

via https://www.politico.com/news/2024/02/20/donald-trump-allies-christian-nationalism-00142086
Christian CoalitionLong battles over its tax status as well as struggles with the Federal Election Commission over illegal campaign contributions led to the decline of this once giant of the right, founded by 1988 presidential candidate Pat Robertson in the lineage and tradition of Jerry Falwell’s Moral Majority in the 1970s.
Christian VoiceChristian Voice was a conservative Christian advocacy group founded in 1978 in the United States. It was one of the first organizations to mobilize evangelical Christians for political activism, aiming to influence public policy and elections in alignment with conservative Christian values. Christian Voice focused on issues such as opposition to abortion, support for traditional family values, and promoting prayer in public schools. The organization was known for its “Moral Report Card,” which graded politicians based on their voting records on key issues important to conservative Christians. Christian Voice played a pioneering role in the rise of the religious right as a political force in America during the late 20th century, setting the stage for later organizations like the Moral Majority. While its influence waned over time, Christian Voice was significant in shaping the early Christian conservative movement in U.S. politics.
Church UnitedChurch United is a conservative Christian organization that seeks to equip and mobilize pastors and church leaders to engage in cultural and political issues from a biblical perspective. Founded in California, the organization focuses on influencing public policy, particularly in areas related to religious freedom, pro-life advocacy, and traditional family values. Church United encourages clergy to take active roles in their communities and the political process, aiming to bridge the gap between the church and government. The organization conducts training sessions, provides resources, and facilitates connections among pastors to unify their efforts in shaping societal norms and legislation according to Christian principles.
Citizens for the EnvironmentSister organization to the CSE (Citizens for a Sound Economy) Koch-funded operation that called acid rain and other environmental problems “myths”
Citizens of the American Republicone of Steve Bannon’s organizations
Club for Growth ActionAn anti-tax, anti-government spending, pro-free market ideology super PAC and sister organization to the Club for Growth PAC, founded by Harlan Crow et al.
Committee for the Free WorldA neocon anti-Communist think tank is the U.S. from 1981 until 1989.

Members included: Donald Rumsfeld, Tom Stoppard, George Will.

Potential involvement with the CIA.
Concerned Women for AmericaFounded 1979 by Beverly LaHaye, wife of End Times religious fiction author Timothy LaHaye.
Congressional Leadership FundThe GOP’s main super PAC dedicated to electing House Republicans.
Conservative Partnership InstituteThe Conservative Partnership Institute describes itself as “a home base and a networking hub for conservatives here in Washington” that helps associates “build the relationships and gain the education and training necessary to thrive in an environment that too often strips you of your resolve.”
Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association (CSPOA)their website claims that the power of any local sheriff is greater than the power of the President — which would be astonishing news to foreign leaders around the world
Convention of StatesExtreme right-wing group seeking to rewrite the Constitution
Council for National Policy (CNP)Founded 1981 by Paul Weyrich, Arch-Demon of the New Right, and Tim LaHaye, who wrote a series of wildly popular novels about the Rapture
Council of Conservative Citizens (CCC)SCOTUS Justice Thurgood Marshall once referred to the group as the “uptown Klan”; today, they push the Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory of William S. Lind and Paul Weyrich — famously, they radicalized Dylann Roof who went on to murder 9 people in the AME Baptist Church
Cowboys for TrumpCowboys for Trump is a political organization founded in 2019 by Otero County Commissioner Couy Griffin in New Mexico. The group was established to support Donald Trump’s presidency and promote his policies, particularly in rural and Western communities. Known for their distinctive horseback rides to show support for Trump, Cowboys for Trump advocates for conservative values such as limited government, Second Amendment rights, and border security. The organization has garnered attention for its outspoken and often controversial positions, reflecting a strong alignment with the broader MAGA movement and grassroots conservative activism.
Edgar and Elsa Prince FoundationRight-wing foundation that has donated about $70 million to Christian nationalist causes between 2000 and 2014.
Fair Missourianti-democracy PAC in MO
Faith & Freedom CoalitionThe Faith & Freedom Coalition is a conservative Christian political advocacy organization founded in 2009 by Ralph Reed, a veteran political strategist and former executive director of the Christian Coalition. The organization aims to mobilize evangelical Christians and other socially conservative voters to influence public policy and elections in the United States. The Faith & Freedom Coalition focuses on promoting traditional family values, religious freedom, pro-life policies, and limited government. It engages in grassroots organizing, voter education, and lobbying efforts to advance its agenda, particularly within the Republican Party. The coalition is known for its significant influence in mobilizing evangelical voters, playing a key role in the success of conservative candidates and causes at both the state and national levels.
fake electorsOne of the many arms of Donald Trump’s attempts to overturn the results of the 2020 election in order to stay in power against the will of the people, the fake electors scheme involved convincing state legislators to fabricate a new slate of Republican electors for the Electoral College vote — in defiance of their own state Constitutions and basic democratic values.
Family America ProjectThe Family America Project is a conservative organization that focuses on promoting traditional family values, patriotism, and civic engagement within American society. The group advocates for policies and initiatives that support the nuclear family structure, religious freedom, and education that aligns with conservative principles. Through various campaigns, events, and outreach efforts, the Family America Project seeks to influence public discourse and policy, aiming to strengthen the role of the family as a foundational institution in the United States. The organization is part of a broader movement that emphasizes the importance of cultural and moral values in shaping the nation’s future.
Federalist SocietyAn organization of lawyers led by Leonard Leo, dedicated to rolling back legal precedents set during the post-WWII era. They essentially control the list of SCOTUS nominees for Republican Presidents.
Focus on the FamilyFocus on the Family is a conservative Christian organization founded in 1977 by psychologist James Dobson. Based in Colorado Springs, Colorado, the organization advocates for traditional family values and promotes a Christian worldview through various media channels, including radio broadcasts, publications, and online content. Focus on the Family is particularly known for its opposition to LGBTQ+ rights, abortion, and same-sex marriage, while it supports homeschooling and abstinence-only education. The organization has significant influence in American conservative circles and often engages in political lobbying to advance its religious and social agenda.
Foundation for Economic Education (FEE)The Foundation for Economic Education (FEE) is one of the oldest free-market think tanks in the United States, founded in 1946 by Leonard E. Read. Based in Atlanta, Georgia, FEE is dedicated to promoting principles of individual liberty, free markets, limited government, and entrepreneurship. The organization provides educational resources, including articles, books, seminars, and online courses, aimed primarily at young people and educators to foster a deeper understanding of economics and classical liberalism. FEE’s work is grounded in the belief that economic freedom and personal responsibility are the foundations of a prosperous society. Over the years, FEE has played a significant role in the dissemination of free-market ideas, influencing generations of economists, policymakers, and business leaders who advocate for libertarian and conservative economic policies.
Foundation for Government AccountabilityThe Foundation for Government Accountability, a conservative think tank that has advocated for loosening child labor protections in certain states, is another major recipient of Uihlein money. The family foundation has given the Foundation for Government Accountability nearly $18 million since 2013, with its largest donation reported in its most recent tax return. In 2021, the family foundation gave FGA $3.6 million, making them FGA’s largest beneficiary that year.
Freedom PartnersKoch network group
Freedom SchoolFree market ideology school that teaches the Robber Barons were heroes and the Gilded Age was when American Was Great Again.
Freedom to Workanti-democracy PAC in Missouri
Generals InternationalDominionist religious group affiliated with the New Apostolic Reformation (NAR)
GOPACThe Republican state and local training organization.
GroypersNamed after the Pepe the Frog meme embraced by the alt-Right, the Groypers are an extremist group seeking to inject their ideologies into the mainstream conservative right-wing movement.
Healing Tree International501(c)(3) non-profit organization affiliated with the New Apostolic Reformation movement.
Heartland Apostolic Prayer NetworkThe Heartland Apostolic Prayer Network (HAPN) is a Christian intercessory prayer movement founded by John Benefiel. It is part of a larger network of prayer groups and ministries that focus on spiritual warfare, prophetic intercession, and the belief in transforming nations through prayer. HAPN operates with the goal of mobilizing believers to pray for the removal of what they view as spiritual strongholds over regions, including addressing issues such as abortion, government policies, and cultural practices. The organization emphasizes a biblical worldview and often engages in activities aimed at influencing both spiritual and political realms in the United States and beyond.
Heartland InstituteThe Heartland Institute is a conservative and libertarian public policy think tank founded in 1984 and based in Illinois. The organization is known for its strong advocacy of free-market principles and limited government intervention. The Heartland Institute is particularly prominent for its work in areas such as environmental policy, healthcare, education, and taxation. It has gained significant attention and controversy for its skepticism of mainstream climate science, particularly its opposition to policies aimed at addressing climate change, and for promoting the idea that human activity is not a significant driver of global warming. The Heartland Institute publishes research, hosts conferences, and engages in advocacy efforts to influence public policy and opinion in line with its ideological positions. The organization is a key player in the network of conservative think tanks and advocacy groups in the United States.
Heritage FoundationThink tank founded by Paul Weyrich as a counterweight to the Brookings Institute and other liberal think tanks, with major funding from beer magnate Joseph Coors and Mellon oligarch Richard Scaife.

Sponsors have included:
* Amoco
* Amway
* Boeing
* Chase
* Chevron
* Dow Chemical
* Exxon
* General Electric
* General Motors
* Mesa Petroleum
* Mobile Oil
* Pfizer
* Philip Morris
* Procter & Gamble
* R. J. Reynolds
* Searle
* Sears
* Roebuck
* SmithKline Beckman
* Union Carbode
* Union Pacific
Honest Elections ProjectThe Honest Elections Project is a conservative advocacy organization focused on so-called “election integrity” and voting laws in the United States. Launched in 2020, the group advocates for stricter voter identification laws, purging voter rolls of ineligible voters, and opposing efforts to expand mail-in voting and same-day voter registration. The Honest Elections Project argues that these measures are necessary to prevent voter fraud and ensure the security of elections, although critics contend that such efforts can suppress voter turnout, particularly among minority and low-income communities. The organization is part of a broader network of conservative groups that have increasingly focused on election-related issues, particularly in the aftermath of the 2020 U.S. presidential election.
Identity EvropaA white supremacist group known for its role in the Charlottesville “Unite the Right” rally — that has since “rebranded” as the American Identity Movement.
Institute for Legislative Action (NRA-ILA)lobbying arm of the NRA, started in 1975
International Coalition of Apostolic Leaders (ICAL)The International Coalition of Apostolic Leaders (ICAL), one of several organizations affiliated with the New Apostolic Reformation (NAR) — along with the US Coalition of Apostolic Leaders (USCAL), its US-based subgroup.
John M. Olin Foundationit was one of the largest “intellectual right” funders before its closing
Judicial WatchOrganization founded by Richard Mellon Scaife that used dark money to go after the Clintons since the 1990s. Part of the “vast right-wing conspiracy” that Hillary accurately described during the 2016 presidential campaign she so tragically lost to a boorish fake billionaire who cares for nothing and no one but himself.
Ku Klux Klan (KKK)Historically one of the most infamous white supremacist groups in the US.
Lynde and Harry Bradley FoundationRight-wing foundation that has donated to the CNP, ALEC, Claremonth Institute and John Eastman, the Heritage Foundation, and the Public Interest Legal Foundation chaired by Cleta Mitchell.
MAGA Inc.Predominant Trump SuperPAC.

MAGA Inc. has become the leading super PAC supporting Donald Trump. It was established before the 2022 midterm elections with an initial funding of $60 million, transferred from Save America, Trump’s leadership PAC. Over the past year, MAGA Inc. has spent considerable amounts to undermine two of Trump’s 2024 competitors: Florida Governor Ron DeSantis and former UN Ambassador Nikki Haley. DeSantis withdrew from the Republican primary last week.

In the first half of 2023, the super PAC refunded $12.5 million back to Save America, which has been primarily responsible for covering Trump’s legal expenses.

The organization was founded by Taylor Budowich, a former adviser to Trump, who serves as its CEO. It is also supported by veteran Trump pollster and strategist Tony Fabrizio, with Meredith O’Rouke handling fundraising efforts.
Mighty I AM movementCultish right-wing “self-actualization” group headed by Robert LeFevre in the 1930s, alongside the rise of fascism in the US
National Alliance (NA)At one time a premier neo-Nazi group in the U.S., founded by William Pierce, author of the white supremacist fascist fantasy novel The Turner Diaries
National Policy InstituteThis think tank based in Augusta, Georgia, describes itself as the right’s answer to the Southern Poverty Law Center and is known for promoting white nationalist views.
National Right to Life CommitteeThe National Right to Life Committee (NRLC) is the oldest and one of the largest pro-life organizations in the United States, founded in 1968. The NRLC is dedicated to advocating against abortion, euthanasia, assisted suicide, and other practices it considers to be threats to human life. The organization operates through a network of state affiliates and local chapters, engaging in public education, lobbying, and political action to influence legislation and public opinion. The NRLC also plays a key role in endorsing and supporting pro-life candidates for public office, aiming to advance its agenda at both the state and federal levels. With its long history and broad reach, the NRLC is a significant force in the American pro-life movement.
National Socialist MovementOne of the largest neo-Nazi groups in the US.

Founded in 1974, this party has been very active since 2005, staging many marches and demonstrations.
neo-NazisThese groups include various organizations that idolize Nazi Germany and embrace anti-Semitic ideologies.
Oath Keepersformed in 2009, the organization actively recruits active-duty military, veterans, and members of law enforcement.

from SPLC:
Although Rhodes likes to claim that the Oath Keepers is a nonpartisan organization, Donald Trump’s inauguration marked the first trip the Oath Keepers would take to Washington, D.C., in support of the Trump administration. In January 2017, Rhodes launched what he called “Operation DefendJ20,” a coordinated effort by Oath Keepers, Three Percenters and the far-right Bikers for Trump group, to descend on the Capitol under the guise of protecting peaceful “American patriots” from supposed “radical leftist groups.”
Opportunities Solutions ProjectLobbying arm of the Uihlein-supported Foundation for Government Accountability, a conservative think tank that has lobbied against child labor laws and attacks direct democracy initiatives like referendums at the state level.
Patriot Front“Patriot Front” and the “bloodandsoil.org” website are the brainchild of a cluster of Texas-based neo-Nazis who created their new entity — a blend of traditional white-supremacist ideology, alt-right sensibilities and activism, and militia-style armed insurrection — as a result of internecine quarreling within their original organization, Vanguard America (VA), in Charlottesville, Virginia, this summer, when one of their marchers drove a car into a crowd of counter-protesters, killing one and maiming 19.
Patriot Mobile ActionPAC for Patriot Mobile, the conservative Christian cellphone company, used to funnel the money for taking over 4 Texas school boards.
Plants Need CO2Front group for the lobbying arm of oil magnate Corbin Robertson Jr.
Proud Boysself-described “Western chauvinists”
Public Interest Legal FoundationA Cleta Mitchell and Bradley Foundation enterprise to sow doubt about the 2020 election — and one conspicuously notable director: John Eastman of the infamous Eastman Memo from Jan 6
Republican Study Committee (RSC)The largest ideological caucus in Congress has an extreme right-wing platform — which is saying something in this climate of right-wing extremity. They believe the following:

The RSC’s key legislative initiatives are detailed in the American Taxpayer Bill of Rights,[6] unveiled in March 2007.[4]

Taxpayers have a right to have a federal government that does not grow beyond their ability to pay for it.
Taxpayers have a right to receive back each dollar that they entrust to the government for their retirement.
Taxpayers have a right to expect the government to balance the budget without having their taxes raised.
Taxpayers have a right to a simple, fair tax code that they can understand.
Restoration ActionRestoration Action, the dark money group affiliated with Restoration PAC, a super PAC funded largely by Richard Uihlein, took in over $20.5 million in revenue 2021, nearly double the $10.4 million it brought in the prior year, according to tax records for the organization. The group’s 2022 fundraising haul was more than 300 times as much as the roughly $64,000 it brought in over the course of 2019 and 51 times the highest revenue recorded any prior year.

Unlike super PACs, which are legally required to report its donors to the Federal Election Commission, Restoration Action is a 501(c)(4) nonprofit that keeps its donors’ identities secret from the public.
Restoring Integrity and Trust in ElectionsBill Barr-associated organization involved in the fake electors scheme to overturn the 2020 election results in favor of Trump, and a proponent of the “independent state legislature doctrine” pushing extreme gerrymandering as a tactic for right-wing statehouse control.
Richard and Helen DeVos Family Foundationdonated about $100 million to Christian nationalist causes between 2000 and 2014
Rutherford InstituteA conservative Christian public interest law firm (non-profit) working in the interest of religious liberties.
SAGE ConsSpiritually Active, Governmentally Engaged Conservative Christians — mostly older white Protestants in Middle America. They revere the past and fear the future.
Schafly EaglesFounded 1972
Seasteading InstituteA 501(c)(3) non-profit organization and think tank devoted to the study of autonomous floating seafaring communities outside the reach of national governments, founded and funded by tech billionaire Peter Thiel.
Senate Judiciary CommitteeSenator from South Carolina who ran for President in 2016 but dropped out before the Republican primaries began.

Known for being a Trump sycophant and a closet queer.
Smith Richardson FoundationThe Smith Richardson Foundation is a private philanthropic foundation established in 1935 by H. Smith Richardson, the founder of the Vicks Chemical Company. The foundation is dedicated to supporting public policy research and projects that advance the long-term interests of the United States, particularly in areas related to national security, foreign policy, and domestic public policy. It funds a wide range of research initiatives, think tanks, and policy institutes, with a focus on promoting effective governance, economic growth, and American leadership in the world. The Smith Richardson Foundation is known for its support of conservative and neoconservative scholars and institutions, though it also funds research across the political spectrum. Its grants have played a significant role in shaping U.S. policy debates on critical issues both domestically and internationally.
Southern Baptistsdemanded increased “religious freedom” to grow their political influence, by maximizing benefits to the church as a tax-exempt power base
Students for Life“Abortion is discrimination based on their age”
Students for TrumpStudents for Trump is a grassroots political organization founded in 2015 by college students in support of Donald Trump’s presidential campaign. The group quickly gained momentum on college campuses across the United States, mobilizing young voters and organizing rallies to advocate for Trump’s policies and campaign. After Trump’s election, Students for Trump continued to operate as a prominent youth-driven movement within the broader MAGA (Make America Great Again) coalition, focusing on promoting conservative values, engaging in political activism, and supporting Republican candidates who align with Trump’s agenda. The organization plays a key role in energizing and mobilizing young conservative voters.
Susan B. Anthony Lista right-wing anti-abortion and anti-free elections org
Tea PartyThe Tea Party movement was an American fiscally conservative political movement within the Republican Party. Members of the movement called for lower taxes and for a reduction of the national debt and federal budget deficit through decreased government spending.[1][2] The movement supported small-government principles[3][4] and opposed government-sponsored universal healthcare.[5] The Tea Party movement has been described as a popular constitutional movement[6] composed of a mixture of libertarian,[7] right-wing populist,[8] and conservative activism.[9] It has sponsored multiple protests and supported various political candidates since 2009.[10][11][12] According to the American Enterprise Institute, various polls in 2013 estimated that slightly over 10% of Americans identified as part of the movement.
Tea Party PatriotsDuring the 2020 election cycle, Richard Uihlein was the top donor to the Tea Party Patriots super PAC and has given the operation at least $4.29 million since the 2016 election.
The American LegionVeterans’ organization founded in 1919, funded in part by J.P. Morgan. Engaged in union-busting and anti-New Deal activities.
The Club for GrowthThe Club for Growth is a conservative 501(c)(4) organization based in Washington, D.C. that advocates for policies focused on cutting taxes, limited government, and “economic freedom.”

It was founded in 1999 by Harlan Crow, Stephen Moore, Thomas L. ‘Dusty’ Rhodes, and Richard Gilder with the stated mission of “promoting public policies that promote economic growth, lower taxes, and limited government”

The Club for Growth has two affiliated political arms – the Club for Growth PAC (a traditional PAC) and Club for Growth Action (a super PAC formed in 2010)

The PAC endorses and raises money for fiscally conservative candidates, while the super PAC runs independent expenditure campaigns supporting or opposing candidates based on their stance on economic issues

Over the years, the Club for Growth and its political arms have spent millions opposing Republican incumbents they view as insufficiently conservative on economic issues, as well as supporting challengers aligned with their free-market, anti-tax agenda

The organization was initially skeptical of Donald Trump’s candidacy in 2016 and spent millions on ads attacking his economic policies before eventually supporting him in the general election against Hillary Clinton

The Club for Growth’s current president is David McIntosh, who has led the organization since the early 2000s
The Covenant, The Sword, and the Arm of the LordA far-right paramilitary organization affiliated with the Christian Identity movement of the 1970s and 80s. The groups dissolved in 1985 after a law enforcement siege of their Arkansas compound dubbed “The Farm” and subsequent arrest and conviction of leadership for weapons violations and domestic terrorism.
The Hoover InstitutionRight-wing think tank
The Leadership InstituteClaimed in a 2018 YouTube promo video by Mike Pence that the organization had trained 185,000 activists, operatives, and elected officials since forming in 1979 under Morton Blackwell, Paul Weyrich, and Richard Viguerie.
The Moral MajorityThe Moral Majority, a prominent political organization founded in 1979 by Jerry Falwell, was a key player in the rise of the Religious Right in the United States. It was primarily focused on promoting conservative social values and had strong connections with several groups and constituencies.
The Sarah Scaife FoundationThe Sarah Scaife Foundation is a prominent American philanthropic organization known for its support of conservative and libertarian causes. Established by the Scaife family, which has a long history of influence in conservative circles, the foundation primarily funds think tanks, policy institutes, and advocacy groups that promote free-market principles, limited government, and traditional values. The foundation is one of several Scaife family foundations that have played a significant role in shaping conservative thought and policy in the United States, particularly through its financial backing of influential organizations like The Heritage Foundation, the American Enterprise Institute, and the Cato Institute. The Sarah Scaife Foundation’s contributions have been instrumental in advancing the conservative agenda across various domains, including economics, foreign policy, and social issues.
The State Policy Networka “mini-Heritage Foundation in each state”
The Supreme Court (SCOTUS)Highest court in the land (yet curiously, the only one without an official ethical standard)
Three PercentersFounded in 2008, the Three Percenters is a loosely organized anti-government group that takes its name from the idea that only 3% of American colonists took up arms against the British in the 18th century American Revolution.
True Texas ProjectPatriot Mobile-aligned group in Texas that has been labeled an anti-government extremist group by the SPLC.
TrumPACAs of February 2016, Amy Kremer was the chair of TrumPAC, a super PAC supporting Donald Trump’s campaign in the 2016 presidential election.[17] TrumPAC later changed its name to Great America PAC.[18] Great America PAC was founded by Kremer and William Doddridge, the CEO of The Jewelry Exchange.[19] Kremer resigned from Great America PAC in May 2016, shortly after Trump became the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, due to decisions which she claimed had been made without her input.[20]
Turning Point USATargets kids and young adults for far right radicalization: https://twitter.com/jennycohn1/status/1463759054212198400
United Daughters of the ConfederacyThe United Daughters of the Confederacy (UDC) is an American lineage society that was founded in 1894 to commemorate Confederate soldiers and to promote the “Lost Cause” narrative of the American Civil War. Over time, the UDC has been associated with several groups and organizations, either directly or through shared goals, such as memorializing the Confederacy or promoting similar historical interpretations.
US Coalition of Apostolic Leaders (USCAL)The US subgroup of the International Coalition of Apostolic Leaders (ICAL), one of several organizations affiliated with the New Apostolic Reformation (NAR)
US Council for World FreedomThe U.S. Council for World Freedom (USCWF) was the American chapter of the World Anti-Communist League (WACL), founded in 1981 by Major General John K. Singlaub, a retired U.S. Army officer and staunch anti-communist. The organization aimed to combat global communism by supporting anti-communist movements, particularly in Latin America, Asia, and Africa, through advocacy, funding, and coordination with other like-minded groups. The USCWF was involved in controversial activities, including providing support to paramilitary groups and other organizations fighting against leftist governments and movements during the Cold War. While its supporters viewed it as a necessary force against the spread of communism, critics accused it of aligning with authoritarian regimes and engaging in unethical practices. The USCWF was part of the broader network of organizations associated with WACL and played a significant role in the international anti-communist movement during the 1980s.
Vision Forum MinistriesNow defunct Evangelical organization in TX
We Build the Wall, IncNon-profit organization founded by Steve Bannon et al, indicted in New York state on multiple counts of fraud and conspiracy for using the fundraised proceeds to enrich themselves.
World Anti-Communist LeagueThe World Anti-Communist League (WACL) was an international coalition of anti-communist organizations and individuals, founded in 1966. The organization brought together a diverse range of members, including political leaders, military officials, and activists from various countries, united by their opposition to communism and Marxist ideologies. WACL played a significant role during the Cold War, supporting anti-communist movements and governments around the world through advocacy, networking, and sometimes covert operations. The league was controversial due to its alliances with far-right and authoritarian figures, as well as its involvement in efforts to undermine communist influence in Latin America, Asia, and other regions. Over time, WACL evolved and eventually rebranded as the World League for Freedom and Democracy in the 1990s, continuing its mission with a broader focus on promoting democracy and human rights.
World Congress of Families (WCF)Already oriented towards Russia by 2011! Held the bulk of its meetings there.

The growing influence of these right-wing organizations underscores a sobering reality: the American political landscape is being quietly reshaped by a network of well-funded, ideologically-driven groups working to erode democratic norms and concentrate power. From the judiciary to the media, their coordinated efforts are pushing the country towards an increasingly authoritarian and corporate-dominated future. These groups feed on fear and division, capitalizing on cultural and political grievances to drive their agenda forward.

Yet, awareness is the first step toward resistance. Understanding the scope and strategy of these organizations allows us to recognize the long-term threats they pose to civil liberties, environmental protections, and the social safety net. As citizens, it is crucial to remain vigilant, informed, and engaged in the defense of democratic principles. The fight for the future of American democracy is far from over, and the stakes could not be higher.

Here’s how to volunteer, if you’re brave enough to answer the call.

Read more

Project 2025 mind map of entities

Project 2025, led by former Trump official Paul Dans and key conservative figures within The Heritage Foundation, sets forth an ambitious conservative and Christian nationalist vision aimed at fundamentally transforming the role of the federal government. Leonard Leo, a prominent conservative known for his influence on the U.S. Supreme Court‘s composition, is among the project’s leading fundraisers.

The initiative seeks to undo over a century of progressive reforms, tracing back to the establishment of a federal administrative framework by Woodrow Wilson, through the New Deal by Roosevelt, to Johnson’s Great Society. It proposes a significant reduction in the federal workforce, which stands at about 2.25 million people.

Project 2025 plans

Essential measures include reducing funding for, or even abolishing, key agencies such as the Department of Justice, the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security, and the Departments of Education and Commerce. Additionally, Project 2025 intends to bring semi-independent agencies like the Federal Communications Commission under closer presidential control.

At its heart, Project 2025 aims to secure a durable conservative dominance within the federal government, aligning it closely with the principles of the MAGA movement and ensuring it operates under the direct oversight of the White House. The project is inspired by the “unitary executive theory” of the Constitution, which argues for sweeping presidential authority over the federal administrative apparatus — in direct contradiction with the delicate system of checks and balances architected by the Founders.

It is also inspired by religious fervor (and the cynical exploitation thereof) — and Project 2025 has brought together a pantheon of Christian nationalist organizations and groups to draft policy that could be implemented with alacrity, select potential appointees for the administration, build networks with GOP at the state and local levels — and with right wing groups and networks around the world.

Project 2025 goals

To realize their extremist, authoritarian goal, Dans is actively recruiting what he terms “conservative warriors” from legal and government networks, including bar associations and offices of state attorneys general. The aim is to embed these individuals in key legal roles throughout the government, thereby embedding the conservative vision deeply within the federal bureaucracy to shape policy and governance for the foreseeable future.

Continue reading What is Project 2025: The GOP’s plan for taking power
Read more

Jesus healing the sick as a foil to Christian nationalism

Jesus commanded us to love our enemies. The vitriol of our politics — the violent rhetoric, the animosity, the refusal to engage in democratic deliberation — is not loving our enemies. It seems to me that Christian nationalism isn’t very Christian, in word or deed.

Jesus hated fame, loathed fortune, and eschewed power. So many of these fake Christians and Christian nationalist groups fundraising for the profane idol of Trumpism are drunk on all three.

They’ve tied capitalism and Christianity together in a way that is both wholly unsupported by the Bible and wholly antithetical to the foundational idea of growing the size of your market, not shrinking it. Jesus threw the moneylenders out of the temple, condemning the commercialization of religious practice. And yet the commercialization of religious practice is alive and well in the American version of Christian nationalism.

Jesus loved the poor, and frequently warned about the dangers of wealth and greed. He told the parable of the Good Samaritan, who stops to help a total stranger in need, expecting no help in return — and said “go and do likewise.” He was very much an original Social Justice Warrior.

Jesus with a group of poor children, as a foil to the Christian nationalist movement

Politics and spirituality are opposites

Jesus also said to render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s, and to God the things that are God’s — indicating that he believed politics and spirituality were not a good mix. God’s realm is not like this one, and he does not care about our petty political trifles. He cares that we love our neighbors as ourselves.

Which is a value I believe in and agree on, even though I’m a Buddhist. There is much wisdom from pretty much all the religious doctrines worth listening to and adopting, even if one does not adopt the symbolism of the identity tropes of a chosen religious practice. Morality does not depend on being a member of the Christian faith or any other particular faith — despite the claims of some in the right-wing. There are moral people everywhere, getting up every day and doing their best to be good humans, good citizens, good neighbors, good parents, friends, volunteers, and so on.

Humans first, tribes second

We have to put our humanity ahead of our group identities if we have a chance of surviving the coming wars — the climate war, the food and water wars, the new cold war, lawfare, and new escalations of the information warfare and psychological warfare around the globe. We are all more alike than we are different — a deep truth that Jesus knew and shared strongly, asking us to live and share that message ourselves, even when it’s sometimes hard.

Continue reading Christian nationalism isn’t very Christian
Read more

Recently the Former Guy proclaimed to know nothing about Project 2025, the plan whose authors include 70% current and former Trump officials. In that he doth protest too much — does Trump support Project 2025? You bet your bippy he does!

What is Project 2025? Think of it as a vast plan, close to the former president, to feverishly establish Christofascism in America starting with Day 1 of a second Trump presidency. It is a 920-page document, and 1000-employee project, to “supercharge” another Trump term with an infusion of Christian nationalism.

More than 100 Christian nationalist organizations and groups are involved in drafting the blueprint for Trump’s next term, should that horrorscape come to pass. One core problem they have, however, is the extreme unpopularity of their ideas. Most Americans would recoil from the draconian measures Project 2025 wishes to bestow upon the nation, unasked for and unwanted — including banning abortion nationwide, restricting IVF, defunding education, pulling out of NATO, etc.

Who is behind Project 2025?

Project 2025 is so toxic in fact that Donald Trump disavowed it on Truth Social:

Trump disavows Project 2025 on his social network, Truth Social

Despite his pathetic attempt to disclaim knowledge about Project 2025, Trump’s current and former staff make up the majority of the group’s architects. Trump’s name appears 312 times in their document. It’s simply not credible that the GOP presumptive nominee is unaware of his loudest allies and advocates — and even if you take him at his word, it constitutes malpractice for a political candidate to be so uninformed.

So allegedly, Donald Trump doesn’t know anyone behind Project 2025. Let’s have a look at the amazing Venn Diagram between Trump officials and Project 2025, shall we?

Karoline Leavitt

Currently serving as the national press secretary for Trump’s 2024 campaign, Karoline Leavitt appears as a trainer in Project 2025 Presidential Administration Academy videos:

Karoline Leavitt, Donald Trump's national press secretary for his 2024 campaign, in a training video for the Project 2025 Presidential Administration Academy

Stephen Miller

Dour, pasty-faced goon Stephen Miller complemented Trump’s sadism as his senior advisor, with his cruel border separation policy for children and their families. He is well known for his white supremacist views and associations, but less well known for his role as head of a legal group on Project 2025’s advisory board. Here is Miller in a recruitment ad for Project 2025:

Stephen Miller, top Trump aide and anti-immigration extremist, stars in recruitment ads for Project 2025
Continue reading Does Trump support Project 2025?
Read more

Trump tax cuts right-wing economics

At least, not according to what Republicans promised when they passed them. The Trump tax cuts didn’t work to grow the economy, increase revenues, alleviate the debt, or benefit ordinary Americans as alleged.

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) was introduced by then-Speaker of the House (and fiscal hawk) Paul Ryan and signed into law by then-President Donald Trump on December 22, 2017. It permanently reduced the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, and lowered the overall tax for all brackets — seems fair, right? Except the wealthy walked away with 50 times the amount of tax benefit as the lower brackets.

Trump tax cuts add $1.5 trillion to the deficit

Not only did the tax cuts not raise revenue as promised — they became a liability on the balance sheet when almost immediately going into the red. The Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) estimated the TCJA would add approximately $1.5 trillion to the federal deficit over 10 years, after accounting for any temporary growth effects. The national debt will rise to accommodate as we borrow money to make up the shortfall between earnings and expenditures.

The Trump tax cuts reduced federal tax revenue, with significant declines in corporate tax receipts (surprise, surprise!). They did the exact opposite of what they promised to do — leaving our economy in a more precarious position even before the pandemic hit.

Who benefited from Trump’s tax cuts?

Conservatives and right-wing economists claim that tax cuts will help ordinary people by raising wages. In reality, however, corporations instead used their tax windfalls to do other things: stock buybacks, dividends, and executive pay. In fact, this happens over and over again each cycle of empty promises from so-called “fiscal conservatives” who in large part know exactly what they do.

Billionaires love Trump tax cuts!

They seem to believe they are entitled to the lion’s share of America’s money (as they have been since at least Mudsill Theory in 1858 and even before) and by gum, nothing is going to stop them — not democracy, not a sense of decency, not a sense of institutional preservation as used to be the very core pillar of Conservatism. No longer. Now it’s a will to power and to plunder. It’s not so much trickle down as it is hoover up.

Reaganomics, Trickle down, Laffer curve, Supply-side economics — it’s all the same

The magical revenue-generating power of tax cuts has been long promised and never delivered by right-wing Republicans. Since the 1980s edition, Reaganomics — the economic “theory” drafted on the back of a cocktail napkin dubbed the Laffer Curve for the slightly drunken man who scribbled it — has moved immense amounts of wealth upwards into the hands and coffers of the 1% and 0.1% at the expense of the masses.

The argument is that rich people will take the extra billions in returned tax money and use it to innovate and grow the economy — except that never happens. And why would they? They don’t have to earn revenue the old-fashioned way, through free market competition — they can just sit back on their laurels, buy a Senator or two, and rake in a huge windfall every few years that a GOP officeholder is in the White House. It is rock solid orthodoxy for the right-wing now, that tax cuts are almost the only policy initiative they care about — along with a side of deregulation and the slashing of the social safety net.

We’ve seen this movie before. The rich guys take the money and run — in many ways literally, into the arms of tax-free havens like the Cayman Islands or Seychelles. They do not return it to the American economy — although they do inject it into American politics, to skew the playing field even further in their favor despite already extracting extraordinary privileges and benefits to themselves from all aspects of their coziness with the political elite and their direct capture of various institutions.

As LBJ once said:

“If you can convince the lowest white man he’s better than the best colored man, he won’t notice you’re picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he’ll empty his pockets for you.”

President Lyndon Baines Johnson, 1960

The economic elites are dividing us over race and religion, in order to pick our pockets. This is why we can’t have nice things. We should boot them out and have nice things.

Related Reading:

Read more

George Orwell’s 1984 lexicon is a lingua franca of authoritarianism, fascism, and totalitarianism. Newspeak words have the stamp of boots on pavement, the stench of disinformation, and are most likely to be found in the mouths of Trumpians and the chryons of the OAN Network.

The terse portmanteus are blunt and blocky, like a brutalist architecture vocabulary. Their simplicity indicates appeal to the small-minded masses for easily digested pablum.

What is Newspeak?

Newspeak is a fictional language created by George Orwell for his dystopian novel 1984, published in 1949. The language serves as an essential tool for the oppressive regime, known as The Party, to control and manipulate the population of Oceania. Newspeak is intentionally designed to restrict the range of thought, eliminate words that convey dissent or rebellion, and enforce political orthodoxy. The language accomplishes this by reducing the complexity of Newspeak vocabulary and grammar, condensing words into simplified forms, and eliminating synonyms and antonyms. The Party aims to eliminate the potential for subversive thoughts by ensuring that the language itself lacks the necessary words and expressions to articulate them.

In Orwell’s world, Newspeak works hand in hand with the concept of “doublethink,” which requires individuals to accept contradictory beliefs simultaneously. This manipulation of language and thought is central to maintaining the Party’s power and control over the populace. Newspeak translation is often the exact opposite of the meaning of the words said.

Newspeak’s ultimate goal is to render dissent and rebellion impossible by making the very thoughts of these actions linguistically unexpressable. As a result, Newspeak serves as a chilling representation of how language can be weaponized to restrict personal freedoms, suppress independent thought, and perpetuate an authoritarian regime.

Newspeak rises again

Those boots ring out again, from Belarus to Hungary to the United States. There are book burnings and the defunding of libraries in multiple states. From Ron DeSantis to Trumpian anti-intellectualism to the rampant proliferation of conspiracy theories, It’s a good time to brush up on the brutalism still actively struggling to take hold.

The following is a list of all Newspeak words from 1984.

Newspeak Orwell

Newspeak 1984 Dictionary

Newspeak termDefinition
anteThe prefix that replaces before
artsemArtificial insemination
bbBig Brother
bellyfeelThe blind, enthusiastic acceptance of an idea
blackwhiteTo accept whatever one is told, regardless of the facts. In the novel, it is described as "...to say that black is white when [the Party says so]" and "...to believe that black is white, and more, to know that black is white, and to forget that one has ever believed the contrary".
crimestopTo rid oneself of unorthodox thoughts that go against Ingsoc's ideology
crimethinkThoughts and concepts that go against Ingsoc, frequently referred to by the standard English “thoughtcrime”, such as liberty, equality, and privacy, and also the criminal act of holding such thoughts
dayorderOrder of the day
depDepartment
doubleplusgoodThe word that replaced Oldspeak words meaning "superlatively good", such as excellent, fabulous, and fantastic
doubleplusungoodThe word that replaced Oldspeak words meaning "superlatively bad", such as terrible and horrible
doublethinkThe act of simultaneously believing two, mutually contradictory ideas
duckspeakAutomatic, vocal support of political orthodoxies
facecrimeA facial expression which reveals that one has committed thoughtcrime
FicdepThe Ministry of Truth's Fiction Department
freeThe absence and the lack of something. "Intellectually free" and "politically free" have been replaced by crimethinkful.
–fulThe suffix for forming an adjective
fullwiseThe word that replaces words such as fully, completely, and totally
goodthinkA synonym for "political orthodoxy" and "a politically orthodox thought" as defined by the Party
goodsexSexual intercourse only for procreation, without any physical pleasure on the part of the woman, and strictly within marriage
goodwiseThe word that replaced well as an adverb
IngsocThe English Socialist Party (i.e. The Party)
joycampLabour camp
malquotedInaccurate representations of the words of Big Brother and of the Party
MiniluvThe Ministry of Love, where the secret police interrogate and torture the enemies of Oceania (torture and brainwashing)
MinipaxThe Ministry of Peace, who wage war for Oceania
MinitrueThe Ministry of Truth, who manufacture consent by way of lies, propaganda, and distorted historical records, while supplying the proles (proletariat) with synthetic culture and entertainment
MiniplentyThe Ministry of Plenty, who keep the population in continual economic hardship (starvation and rationing)
OldspeakStandard English
oldthinkIdeas from the time before the Party's revolution, such as objectivity and rationalism
ownlifeA person's anti-social tendency to enjoy solitude and individualism
plusgoodThe word that replaced Oldspeak words meaning "very good", such as great
plusungoodThe word that replaced "very bad"
PornosecThe pornography production section (Porno sector) of the Ministry of Truth's Fiction Department
prolefeedPopular culture for entertaining Oceania's working class
RecdepThe Ministry of Truth's Records Department, where Winston Smith rewrites historical records so they conform to the Party's agenda
rectifyThe Ministry of Truth's euphemism for manipulating a historical record
refTo refer (to someone or something)
secSector
sexcrimeA sexual immorality, such as fornication, adultery, oral sex, and homosexuality; any sex act that deviates from Party directives to use sex only for procreation
speakwriteA machine that transcribes speech into text
TeledepThe Ministry of Truth's Telecommunications Department
telescreenA two-way television set with which the Party spy upon Oceania's population
thinkpolThe Thought Police, the secret police force of Oceania's government
unpersonAn executed person whose existence is erased from history and memory
upsubAn upwards submission to higher authority
–wiseThe only suffix for forming an adverb

Creation of New Words in Newspeak

One of the most fascinating and insidious aspects of Newspeak is the methodical creation of new words. This process is not only about inventing new terms but also about streamlining and simplifying the language to ensure it serves the purposes of the Party. Here’s how this process works:

1. Compounding Words

In Newspeak, many new words are created by combining existing ones. This technique, known as compounding, helps to streamline communication by reducing longer phrases into single, concise terms. For example:

  • Goodthink: A compound of “good” and “think,” meaning orthodox thought, or thoughts that align with Party doctrine.
  • Oldthink: A combination of “old” and “think,” referring to thoughts that are based on outdated, pre-revolutionary beliefs and values.

By merging words in this manner, Newspeak eliminates the need for descriptive phrases, thereby simplifying language and controlling thought.

2. Prefixes and Suffixes

Newspeak employs prefixes and suffixes to create new words and alter the meanings of existing ones. This method ensures that language remains efficient and devoid of any unnecessary complexity. Some common prefixes and suffixes include:

  • Un-: This prefix is used to form the negative of any word, thereby eliminating the need for antonyms. For example, “unhappy” replaces “sad.”
  • Plus- and Doubleplus-: These prefixes intensify the meaning of words. “Plusgood” means very good, while “doubleplusgood” means excellent or extremely good.
  • -wise: This suffix is used to form adverbs. For instance, “speedwise” means quickly.

Through these prefixes and suffixes, Newspeak ensures that language remains consistent and simplified, reinforcing the Party’s control over thought.

3. Simplification of Grammar

The creation of new words in Newspeak is also characterized by the simplification of grammar. Irregular verbs and noun forms are abolished, making all words conform to a delimited list of regular patterns. For example:

  • Think: In Newspeak, the past tense of “think” would simply be “thinked,” and the past participle would also be “thinked,” eliminating irregular forms like “thought.”
  • Knife: Plural forms are regularized, so “knife” becomes “knifes” instead of “knives.”

This grammatical regularization reduces the cognitive load required to learn and use the language, further limiting the scope for complex or critical thought.

4. Abolition of Synonyms and Antonyms

Newspeak systematically removes synonyms and antonyms to narrow the range of meaning, engendering black and white thinking. Each concept is reduced to a single, unambiguous word, eliminating nuances and shades of meaning:

  • Good: The word “good” stands alone without synonyms like “excellent,” “great,” or “superb.” Intensifiers like “plus-” and “doubleplus-” are used instead.
  • Bad: Instead of having a separate word like “bad,” Newspeak uses “ungood.” This not only simplifies vocabulary but also imposes a binary way of thinking.

By removing synonyms and antonyms, Newspeak reduces the complexity of language, ensuring that only Party-approved ideas can be easily communicated.

5. Creation of Euphemisms

In Newspeak, euphemisms are crafted to mask the true nature of unpleasant or controversial realities, aligning language with Party propaganda. For instance:

  • Joycamp: A euphemism for forced labor camps, designed to make the concept seem more palatable and less threatening.
  • Minipax: Short for the Ministry of Peace, which actually oversees war. The euphemistic name helps to disguise its true function.

These euphemisms help to distort reality, making it easier for the Party to maintain control over the population’s perceptions and beliefs.

Related to Newspeak:

Disinformation Dictionary ↗

Disinformation is a practice with a unique Orwellian lexicon all its own, collated in this disinformation dictionary.

disinformation

Essential thinkers on authoritarian personality theory ↗

The authoritarian personality is characterized by excessive strictness and a propensity to exhibit oppressive behavior towards perceived subordinates.

How did they get this way? Are people born with authoritarian personalities, or is the authoritarian “made” predominately by circumstance?

authoritarians gather for a witch hunt

Pathocracy Definition: Are we in one? ↗

Pathocracy is a relatively lesser-known concept in political science and psychology, which refers to a system of government in which individuals with personality disorders, particularly those who exhibit psychopathic, narcissistic, and similar traits (i.e. the “evil of Cluster B“), hold significant power.

Donald Trump pathocracy, by Midjourney
Read more

conspiracy theories, disinformation, and fake news

Conspiracy Theory Dictionary: From QAnon to Gnostics

In half a decade we’ve gone from Jeb Bush making a serious run for president to Marjorie Taylor Greene running unopposed and winning a House seat in Georgia. QAnon came seemingly out of nowhere, but taps into a much deeper and older series of conspiracy theories that have surfaced, resurfaced, and been remixed throughout time.

Essentially, QAnon is a recycling of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion conspiracy theory that drove the Nazi ideology and led to the genocide of over 6 million Jews, gypsies, gays, and others who made Hitler mad. It’s a derivative of the global cabal conspiracy theory, and is riddled with the kind of conspiratorial paranoia that led to the deaths of over 75 million people in World War II.

The spread of the QAnon conspiracy theory greatly benefits from historical memory, getting a generous marketing boost from sheer familiarity. It also benefits from an authoritarian mentality growing louder in America, with a predilection for magical thinking and a susceptibility to conspiratorial thinking.

conspiracy theories, by midjourney

Tales as old as time

Conspiracy theories have been around much longer even than the Protocols — stretching back about as long as recorded history itself. Why do people believe in conspiracy theories? In an increasingly complex world brimming with real-time communication capabilities, the cognitive appeal of easy answers may simply be stronger than ever before.

Anthropologists believe that conspiracy theory has been around for about as long as human beings have been able to communicate. Historians describe one of the earliest conspiracy theories as originating in ancient Mesopotamia, involving a god named Marduk and a goddess called Tiamat — both figures in Babylonian creation mythology.

According to the myth, Marduk defeated Tiamat in battle and created the world from her body — but some ancient Mesopotamians at the time thought that the story was not actually a mere myth, but a political cover-up of a real-life conspiracy in which the followers of Marduk secretly plotted to overthrow Tiamat to seize power.

This “original conspiracy theory” was likely driven by political tensions between city-states in ancient Mesopotamia, although there are very few written records still around to corroborate the origin of the theory or perception of the story at the time. Nevertheless, the Marduk-Tiamat myth is regarded as one of the earliest known examples of widespread belief in conspiracy theories, and it points to the relative commonality and frequency of false narratives throughout history.

Whether deployed purposefully to deceive a population for political advantage, created to exploit people economically, or invented “naturally” as a simple yet satisfying explanation for otherwise complicated and overwhelming phenomena, conspiracy theories are undoubtedly here to stay in culture more broadly for some time to come. We had best get the lay of the land, and understand the language we might use to describe and talk about them.

conspiracy theories: old men around the world map, by midjourney

Conspiracy Theory Dictionary

4chanA notorious internet message board with an unruly culture capable of trolling, pranks, and crimes.
8chanIf 4chan wasn’t raw and lawless enough for you, you could try the even more right-wing “free speech”-haven 8chan while it still stood (now 8kun). Described by its founder Frederick Bennan as “if 4chan and reddit had a baby,” the site is notorious for incubating Gamergate, which morphed into PizzaGate, which morphed into QAnon — and for generally being a cesspool of humanity’s worst stuff.
9/11 truthersPeople who believe the attacks on the Twin Towers in New York City in 2001 were either known about ahead of time and allowed to happen, or were intentionally planned by the US government.
alien abductionPeople who claim to have been captured by intelligent life from another planet, taken to a spaceship or other plane of existence, and brought back — as well as the folks who believe them.
American carnageEvocative of “immense loss” in the Nazi mythology
AntifaAntifa is anti-fascism, so the anti-anti-fascists are just fascists wrapped in a double negative. They are the real cancel culture — and a dangerous one (book burning and everything!).
Anti-SemitismOne of history’s oldest hatreds, stretching back to early biblical times
Biblical inerrancyBiblical inerrancy is the doctrine that the Bible, in its original manuscripts, is without error or fault in all its teachings. 
birtherismOne of Donald Trump‘s original Big Lies — that President Barack Obama wasn’t born in the U.S. and therefore, wasn’t a “legitimate” president.
Black Lives MatterA social justice movement advocating for non-violent civil disobedience in protest against incidents of police brutality and all racially motivated violence against black people.
blood libelA false accusation or myth that Jewish people used the blood of Christians, especially children, in religious rituals, historically used to justify persecution of Jews.
child traffickingThe illegal practice of procuring or trading children for the purpose of exploitation, such as forced labor, sexual exploitation, or illegal adoption.
Christian IdentityA religious belief system that asserts that white people of European descent are God’s chosen people, often associated with white supremacist and extremist groups.
climate change denialThe rejection or dismissal of the scientific consensus that the climate is changing and that human activity is a significant contributing factor. Part of a broader cultural trend of science denialism.
The ConfederacyRefers to the Confederate States of America, a group of 11 southern states that seceded from the United States in 1861, leading to the American Civil War, primarily over the issue of slavery.
contaminationThe presence of an unwanted substance or impurity in another substance, making it unsafe or unsuitable for use.
cosmopolitanismAnother term for globalist or internationalist, which are all dog whistles for Jewish people (see also: global cabal, blood libel)
Crossing the RubiconA phrase that signifies passing a point of no return, derived from Julius Caesar’s irreversible crossing of the Rubicon River in 49 BC, leading to the Roman Civil War.
cultural MarxismAnti-semitic conspiracy theory alleging that Jewish intellectuals who fled the Hitler regime were responsible for infecting American culture with their communist takeover plans and that this holy war is the war the right-wing fights each day.
deep stateThe idea of a body within the government and military that operates independently of elected officials, often believed to manipulate government policy and direction.
DVE(Domestic Violent Extremism): Refers to violent acts committed within a country’s borders by individuals motivated by domestic political, religious, racial, or social ideologies.
fake newsInformation that is false or misleading, created and disseminated with the intent to deceive the public or sway public opinion.
GamerGateA controversy that started in 2014 involving the harassment of women in the video game industry, under the guise of advocating for ethics in gaming journalism.
George SorosA Hungarian-American billionaire investor and philanthropist, often the subject of unfounded conspiracy theories alleging he manipulates global politics and economies.
HollywoodThe historic center of the United States film industry, often used to refer broadly to American cinema and its cultural influence.
IlluminatiA term often associated with various conspiracy theories that allege a secret society controlling world affairs, originally referring to the Bavarian Illuminati, an Enlightenment-era secret society.
InfoWarsA controversial far-right media platform known for promoting conspiracy theories, disinformation, and misinformation, hosted by clinical narcissist Alex Jones.
JFK assassinationThe assassination of President John F. Kennedy on November 22, 1963, in Dallas, Texas, an event surrounded by numerous conspiracy theories regarding the motives and identities of the assassins.
John Birch SocietyThe QAnon of its day (circa 1960s), this extreme right-wing group was theoretically about anti-communist ideals but espoused a host of conspiracy theories and outlandish beliefs.
lamestream mediaDerogatory term for any media that isn’t right-wing media.
leftist apocalypseA hyperbolic term used by some critics to describe a scenario where leftist or progressive policies lead to societal collapse or significant negative consequences.
Makers and TakersA right-wing economic dichotomy used to describe individuals or groups who contribute to society or the economy (makers) versus those who are perceived to take from it without contributing (takers). See also: Mudsill Theory, trickle down economics, supply side economics, Reaganomics, Libertarianism
micro-propaganda machineMPM: Refers to the use of targeted, small-scale dissemination of propaganda, often through social media and other digital platforms, to influence public opinion or behavior.
motivated reasoningThe cognitive process where individuals form conclusions that are more favorable to their preexisting beliefs or desires, rather than based on objective evidence.
New World OrderA conspiracy theory that posits a secretly emerging totalitarian world government, often associated with fears of loss of sovereignty and individual freedoms. (see also, OWG, ZOG)
nullificationA constitutional “theory” put forth by southern states before the Civil War that they have the power to invalidate any federal laws or judicial decisions they consider unconstitutional. It’s never been upheld by the federal courts.
One World GovernmentThe concept of a single government authority that would govern the entire world, often discussed in the context of global cooperation or, conversely, as a dystopian threat in conspiracy theories. (see also: NWO, ZOG)
PizzaGateA debunked and baseless conspiracy theory alleging the involvement of certain U.S. political figures in a child sex trafficking ring, supposedly operated out of a Washington, D.C., pizzeria.
post-truthRefers to a cultural and political context in which debate is framed largely by appeals to emotion disconnected from the details of policy, and by the repeated assertion of talking points to which factual rebuttals are ignored.
PRpublic relations
propagandaInformation, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote a political cause or point of view.
Protocols of the Elders of ZionForged anti-semitic document alleging a secret Jewish child murder conspiracy used by Hitler to gin up support for his regime.
PsyOpsPsychological operations: Operations intended to convey selected information and indicators to audiences to influence their emotions, motives, objective reasoning, and ultimately the behavior of governments, organizations, groups, and individuals. Used as part of hybrid warfare and information warfare tactics in geopolitical (and, sadly, domestic) arenas.
QAnonA baseless conspiracy theory alleging that a secret cabal of Satan-worshipping pedophiles is running a global child sex-trafficking ring and plotting against former U.S. President Donald Trump.
Q DropsMessages or “drops” posted on internet forums by “Q,” the anonymous figure at the center of the QAnon conspiracy theory, often cryptic and claiming to reveal secret information about a supposed deep state conspiracy.
reactionary modernismA term that describes the combination of modern technological development with traditionalist or reactionary political and cultural beliefs, often seen in fascist ideologies.
Reichstag fireAn arson attack on the Reichstag building (home of the German parliament) in Berlin on February 27, 1933, which the Nazi regime used as a pretext to claim that Communists were plotting against the German government.
RothschildsA wealthy Jewish family of bankers, often subject to various unfounded conspiracy theories alleging they control global financial systems and world events.
sock puppetsOnline identities used for purposes of deception, such as to praise, defend, or support a person or organization while appearing to be an independent party.
“Stand back and stand by”A phrase used by former U.S. President Donald Trump during a presidential debate, which was interpreted as a call to readiness by the Proud Boys, a far-right and neo-fascist organization that seemed to answer his calling during the riot and coup attempt at the Capitol on January 6, 2021.
The StormWithin the context of QAnon, a prophesied event in which members of the supposed deep state cabal will be arrested and punished for their crimes.
WikiLeaksWikiLeaks is a controversial platform known for publishing classified and secret documents from anonymous sources, gaining international attention for its major leaks. While it has played a significant role in exposing hidden information, its release of selectively edited materials has also contributed to the spread of conspiracy theories related to American and Russian politics.
ZOGZOG (Zionist Occupation Government): A conspiracy theory claiming that Jewish people secretly control a country, particularly the United States, while the term itself is antisemitic and unfounded.
Read more

The war in Ukraine is less “surprising” to some who’ve seen it raging since 2014. Although it escalated greatly in 2022, the Ukraine timeline dates back all the way to the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991.

To understand the backstory — which is now inextricably intertwined with our own presidential history given the impeachment of Donald Trump over his phone calls with Zelensky to the Republican Party‘s current-day support of the aims of Vladimir Putin — we have to go back to a time when no one was stronger on anti-Russian policy than GOP darling Ronald Reagan.

  • 1991 — Ukraine declares independence and becomes an independent entity after the fall of the Soviet Union
  • 1994 — Ukraine agrees to give up its nuclear arsenal in exchange for a protection agreement with Russia, United States, Britain, and Ireland (Budapest Memorandum)
  • 2004Viktor Yanukovich “wins” election under dubious circumstances and is deposed for a do over election, which he loses to Viktor Yuschenko (Orange Revolution)
  • 2006 — Viktor Yanukovych begins working directly with Paul Manafort, in an effort to boost his image after his electoral loss. Manafort was known for his work helping the “Torturers’ Lobby” of brutal dictators around the world in the 1980s, with Roger Stone (another infamous dirty trickster best known for his role as a fixer for Richard Nixon).
  • 2007 — Yanukovych’s Party of Regions does well in the Ukranian parliamentary elections, gaining a large number of seats credited to Manafort’s strategic advice about Western-style campaigning.
  • 2010 — Yanukovych is elected President of Ukraine, again largely crediting Manafort’s strategies for his comeback.
  • Nov 2013 — Having promised a more European-style government in order to win the presidency in 2010, Yanukovych turned on his word and initiated more pro-Russian policies than the Ukranians had signed up for. Yanukovych is now beset by enormous public protests against the corruption of his regime, and his unilateral decision to abandon an association agreement with the EU in favor of a trade agreement with Russia (Maidan Revolution / Revolution of Dignity)
  • Feb 2014 — After a harrowing 93 days barricaded inside Kyiv’s Maidan Square, activists are victorious; Yanukovich is deposed and flees to Russia
  • Mar 2014 — Russian forces invade and annex the region of Crimea within Ukraine
  • Apr 2014 — Russian forces invade the Donetsk and Luhansk regions in eastern Ukraine, escalating a war that continues to this day and had already killed more than 14,000 people by the time the 2022 large scale invasion began
  • Apr 2014 — Hunter Biden and business partner Devon Archer join the board of Burisma
  • May 2014 — Candy magnate Petro Poroshenko succeeds Yanukovych as president of Ukraine
  • Feb 10, 2015Viktor Shokin takes office as the prosecutor general of Ukraine, tasked with getting a handle on rampant corruption
  • Oct 8, 2015 — US Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland reiterates strong concerns that Shokin is failing to prosecute obvious corruption in Ukraine, and that efforts at anti-corruption must be stepped up there
  • Dec 8, 2015 — Then VP and point person on Ukraine Joe Biden gave a speech to the Ukrainian parliament, urging them to step up their efforts to pursue anti-corruption reforms to help strengthen their young democracy
  • Winter 2015-6 — Biden is talking to Poroshenko about how Shokin is slow-walking their anti-corruption efforts
  • Feb 16, 2016 — Viktor Shokin resigns as Prosecutor General of Ukraine
  • May 12, 2016Yuriy Lutsenko is appointed as the new Prosecutor General, despite having no law degree or legal experience. At first he takes a hard line against Burisma.
  • Aug 14, 2016 — “Black ledger” payments to Paul Manafort from Viktor Yanukovych go public
  • May 10, 2017Trump hosts Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and Ambassador Sergey Kislyak in the Oval Office, the day after he has fired James Comey as the Director of the FBI over “the Russian thing” — only a photographer for Russian news agency Tass is allowed to cover the meeting
  • June 2017 — The NotPetya malware emerges and causes extensive damage — especially in Ukraine. It is widely fingerprinted as a Russian state-sponsored attack.
  • October 30, 2017 — Paul Manafort is indicted by Special Counsel Robert Mueller for money laundering, acting as a foreign agent, making false statements, and conspiracy against the United States, as part of the ongoing investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 US presidential election.
  • Apr 30, 2018 — At a Trump dinner in his DC hotel, Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman tell Trump they think Ukraine Ambassador Yovanovitch isn’t loyal enough to him
  • May-June 2018 — Lev Parnas pressures US Congressman Pete Sessions to pressure Trump to fire Yovanovitch in exchange for campaign funding; he and Fruman are later arrested for this scheme and other federal charges of illegal foreign funding of election campaigns
  • Summer 2018 — Trump reportedly frets a potential Biden run for the presidency
  • August 2018 — Lev Parnas’s company, which is named (I kid you not) “Fraud Guarantee,” hires Rudy Giuliani‘s firm for $500,000 to continue working on getting Ambassador Yovanovitch fired for doing her job pursuing corruption in Ukraine.
  • Sept 2018Congress passes and Trump signs a spending bill for the Department of Defense, including $250 million in military aid to Ukraine under the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative (USAI)
  • Late 2018 — Lev Parnas arranges for Giuliani to meet with both Shokin and Lutsenko on multiple occasions; Devin Nunes also secretly meets with Shokin in Vienna.
  • Dec 6, 2018 — Trump pressures Parnas and Fruman to pressure the Ukrainian government to open an investigation into the Bidens
  • Late Feb, 2019 — Parnas and Fruman pressure then-President Poroshenko to open an investigation into the Bidens, in exchange for a state visit at the White House that would help his challenging re-election campaign against the popular young upstart comedian Volodymyr Zelenskyy
  • Spring 2019 — A “working group” of Giuliani, Parnas, Fruman, conservative Hill reporter John Solomon, Joseph diGenova, Victoria Toensing, and Devin Nunes’s top aide Harvey meet regularly to work on the quid pro quo project
  • March 2019 — Prosecutor General Lutsenko opens 2 investigations: 1 into alleged Ukrainian involvement in the 2016 US election (a Russian conspiracy theory) and a 2nd into Hunter Biden’s involvement with Burisma (he will later retract many of his allegations).
  • March 24, 2019 — Don Jr. tweets criticism of Ambassador Yovanovitch
  • March 28, 2019 — Giuliani hands off a smear campaign packet of disinformation cobbled together on Yovanovitch, intended for Secretary of State Mike Pompeo
  • April 24, 2019 — Trump orders Marie Yovanovitch recalled from her diplomatic mission in Ukraine, after Giuliani and other allies reported she was undermining and obstructing their efforts to extort Ukrainian president Volodomyr Zelensky to claim he was investigating the Bidens for corruption.
  • July 25, 2019 — On a phone call with Zelensky, Trump pressures him to investigate Biden in exchange for the release of funds to keep the Russians at bay in Crimea. He disparages Yovanovitch on the call, referring to her as “bad news.”
  • Oct 3, 2019 — Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch is unsummarily fired by Donald Trump after recently having been invited to continue her post for several more years
  • Dec 18, 2019 — The House of Representatives votes to impeach Donald Trump for abuse of power and obstruction of Congress, the first of two times Trump will be impeached.
  • Feb 5, 2020 — The Republican-controlled Senate voted along party lines, having called no witnesses, to acquit Donald Trump of both impeachment charges.
  • Feb 2022 — Russian forces begin a large scale land invasion of Ukraine including massive attacks on civilian cities.
  • Feb 2024 — Donald Trump holds up a bipartisan immigration deal in Congress that would allow military aide funds to Ukraine to be released. Running for a second term as US President, Trump continues to break with 80 years of the post-WWII international order — in refusing to support NATO, the alliance widely regarded as keeping the peace in Europe broadly, as well as in supporting the regime of Vladimir Putin in Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine.
Read more

Wealth Cult -- rich men behaving badly, by Midjourney

A network of exceedingly wealthy individuals and organizations have channeled their vast fortunes into influencing American politics, policy, and public opinion — they’ve formed a wealth cult. And they’ve leveraged that cult and its considerable fortune to influence and in many ways dramatically transform American politics.

The term “dark money” refers to political spending meant to influence the decision-making and critical thinking of the public and lawmakers where the source of the money is not disclosed. This lack of transparency makes it challenging to trace the influence back to its origins, hence the term “dark.”

And, it is dark indeed.

Wealth cult anchors the trench coat

The Wealth Cult is one of 3 primary groups or clusters supporting the right-wing and generally, the Republican Party. It anchors the trench coat by funding the 2 cults above it: the Christian Cult, and the White Cult.

Its story is stealthy and significant.

A bunch of billionaires toast themselves to themselves, by Midjourney

The wealth cult has funded disinformation campaigns, the spread of conspiracy theories, created fake social movements through astroturfing, enabled violent extremists to attack their country’s capitol, cruelly deprived vulnerable people (especially immigrants, poor people, and women) of the kind of state aid granted generously throughout the developed world, bribed regulators, rigged elections, crashed economies, and on and on in service of their extremist free market ideology beliefs.

They believe in “makers and takers,” or Mudsill Theory, as it was once called by pedophile and racist Senator and slavery enthusiast James Henry Hammond. Some people were born to serve others, they say. Hierarchies are natural, they claim. Wealthy men should make all the decisions — because that’s what’s best for everyone, they say in paternalistic tones.

I don’t buy it. I believe all men are created equal. So did a certain Founder of our country.

Continue reading Wealth Cult: The oligarchs influencing American politics from the shadows
Read more

Shitposting, a term that has seeped into the mainstream of internet culture, is often characterized by the act of posting deliberately provocative, off-topic, or nonsensical content in online communities and on social media. The somewhat vulgar term encapsulates a spectrum of online behavior ranging from harmless, humorous banter to malicious, divisive content.

Typically, a shit-post is defined by its lack of substantive content, its primary goal being to elicit attention and reactions — whether amusement, confusion, or irritation — from its intended audience. Closely related to trolling, shitposting is one aspect of a broader pantheon of bad faith behavior online.

Shit-poster motivations

The demographic engaging in shit-posting is diverse, cutting across various age groups, social strata, and political affiliations. However, it’s particularly prevalent among younger internet users who are well-versed in meme culture and online vernacular. The motivations for shit-posting can be as varied as its practitioners.

Some engage in it for humor and entertainment, seeing it as a form of digital performance art. Others may use it as a tool for social commentary or satire, while a more nefarious subset might employ it to spread disinformation and misinformation, sow discord, and/or harass individuals or groups.

Online trolls shitposting on the internet, by Midjourney

Context in US politics

In the realm of U.S. politics, shit-posting has assumed a significant role in recent elections, especially on platforms like Twitter / X, Reddit, and Facebook. Politicians, activists, and politically engaged individuals often use this tactic to galvanize supporters, mock opponents, or shape public perception. It’s not uncommon to see political shit-posts that are laden with irony, exaggeration, or out-of-context information, designed to inflame passions or reinforce existing biases — or exploit them.

Recognition and response

Recognizing shit-posting involves a discerning eye. Key indicators include the use of hyperbole, irony, non-sequiturs, and content that seems outlandishly out of place or context. The tone is often mocking or sarcastic. Visual cues, such as memes or exaggerated images, are common.

Responding to shit-posting is a nuanced affair. Engaging with it can sometimes amplify the message, which might be the poster’s intention. A measured approach is to assess the intent behind the post. If it’s harmless humor, it might warrant a light-hearted response or none at all.

For posts that are disinformation or border on misinformation or toxicity, countering with factual information, reporting the content, or choosing not to engage are viable strategies. The key is not to feed into the cycle of provocation and reaction that shit-posting often seeks to perpetuate.

Shitposting troll farms lurk in the shadows, beaming disinformation across the land -- by Midjourney

Fighting back

Shit-posting, in its many forms, is a complex phenomenon in the digital age. It straddles the line between being a form of modern-day satire and a tool for misinformation, propaganda, and/or cyberbullying. As digital communication continues to evolve, understanding the nuances of shit-posting – its forms, motivations, and impacts – becomes crucial, particularly in politically charged environments. Navigating this landscape requires a balanced approach, blending awareness, discernment, and thoughtful engagement.

This overview provides a basic understanding of shit-posting, but the landscape is ever-changing, with new forms and norms continually emerging. The ongoing evolution of online communication norms, including phenomena like shit-posting, is particularly fascinating and significant in the broader context of digital culture and political discourse.

Read more

republican vs. democrat cage match boxing ring

Buckle up, we’re in for a wild ride. Many of the serious scholars of political history and authoritarian regimes are sounding the alarm bells that, although it is a very very good thing that we got the Trump crime family out of the Oval Office, it is still a very very bad thing for America to have so rapidly tilted towards authoritarianism. How did we get here?! How has hyper partisanship escalated to the point of an attempted coup by 126 sitting Republican House Representatives? How has political polarization gotten this bad?

These are some of the resources that have helped me continue grappling with that question, and with the rapidly shifting landscape of information warfare. How can we understand this era of polarization, this age of tribalism? This outline is a work in progress, and I’m planning to keep adding to this list as the tape keeps rolling.

Right-Wing Authoritarianism

Authoritarianism is both a personality type and a form of government — it operates at both the interpersonal and the societal level. The words authoritarian and fascist are often used interchangeably, but fascism is a more specific type of authoritarianism, and far more historically recent.

America has had flavors of authoritarianism since its founding, and when fascism came along the right-wing authoritarians ate it up — and deeply wanted the United States to be a part of it. Only after they became social pariahs did they change position to support American involvement in World War II — and some persisted even after the attack of Pearl Harbor.

Scholars of authoritarianism

  • Hannah Arendt — The Origins of Totalitarianism
  • Bob Altemeyer — The Authoritarians
  • Derrida — the logic of the unconscious; performativity in the act of lying
  • ketman — Ketman is the psychological concept of concealing one’s true aims, akin to doublethink in Orwell’s 1984, that served as a central theme to Polish dissident Czesław Miłosz‘s book The Captive Mind about intellectual life under totalitarianism during the Communist post-WWII occupation.
  • Erich Fromm — coined the term “malignant narcissism” to describe the psychological character of the Nazis. He also wrote extensively about the mindset of the authoritarian follower in his seminal work, Escape from Freedom.
  • Eric Hoffer — his book The True Believers explores the mind of the authoritarian follower, and the appeal of losing oneself in a totalist movement
  • Fascism — elevation of the id as the source of truth; enthusiasm for political violence
  • Tyrants and dictators
  • John Dean — 3 types of authoritarian personality:
    • social dominators
    • authoritarian followers
    • double highs — social dominators who can “switch” to become followers in certain circumstances
  • Loyalty; hero worship
    • Freud = deeply distrustful of hero worship and worried that it indulged people’s needs for vertical authority. He found the archetype of the authoritarian primal father very troubling.
  • Ayn Rand
    • The Fountainhead (1943)
    • Atlas Shrugged (1957)
    • Objectivism ideology
  • Greatness Thinking; heroic individualism
  • Nietszche — will to power; the Uberman
  • Richard Hofstadter — The Paranoid Style
  • George Lakoff — moral framing; strict father morality
  • Neil Postman — Entertaining Ourselves to Death
  • Anti-Intellectualism
  • Can be disguised as hyper-rationalism (Communism)
  • More authoritarianism books
Continue reading Hyper Partisanship: How to understand American politics today
Read more

What are the signs of fascism? And what is fascism? Fascism is a complex and multi-faceted ideology that can manifest in various ways, making it challenging to pin down with a single definition. However, there are certain signs, traits, tactics, and behaviors that are commonly associated with it. Here’s an overview:

Traits

  1. Authoritarianism: Fascism is inherently authoritarian, advocating for a centralized power structure, often under a single charismatic leader.
  2. Nationalism: Extreme nationalism is a hallmark, often coupled with the belief in the inherent superiority of one’s own nation over others — a form of collective narcissism.
  3. Militarism: A strong emphasis on military power and aggression as a means to achieve national objectives is common. Many fascists are former military and/or current militia members.
  4. Anti-Intellectualism: Fascist regimes often distrust intellectuals and experts, preferring emotion and popular sentiment. Railing against the “Eastern elite” is a common refrain.
  5. Xenophobia and Racism: There’s often a strong element of fear or hatred towards outsiders or people considered “different.”
  6. Traditionalism: A romanticized, mythologized view of the past and a desire to return to so-called “traditional” values.
  7. Anti-Communism: A strong opposition to left-wing ideologies, particularly communism and socialism.

Tactics

  1. Propaganda: The use of propaganda to manipulate public opinion is rampant in fascist regimes. Often, conspiracy theories are used to whip up strong emotion quickly.
  2. Suppression of Dissent: Any form of opposition is often met with severe punishment, including imprisonment or even death.
  3. Cult of Personality: Leaders often build a cult of personality around themselves, portraying themselves as the saviors of the nation.
  4. Scapegoating: Blaming societal problems on a particular group, often minorities, to divert attention from real issues. One of the oldest examples is antisemitism.
  5. Control Over Media: The media is often state-controlled or heavily influenced to propagate the regime’s messages.
  6. Political Violence: The use of violence, or the threat thereof, is common to intimidate opposition and enforce policies.

Behaviors and Beliefs

  1. Dogmatic Beliefs: A refusal to consider alternative viewpoints or engage in constructive debate.
  2. Manipulation of History: Rewriting, distorting, or hiding historical facts to suit the regime’s preferred narrative.
  3. Secrecy and Surveillance: A lack of transparency and an emphasis on surveillance to monitor citizens.
  4. Economic Control: Often, there’s a form of state capitalism where the government controls key industries.
  5. Social Darwinism: A belief in the survival of the fittest, often used to justify social inequality.

Identifying a Fascist

Identifying someone as a fascist can be complex due to the ideology’s fluid nature. However, if an individual strongly exhibits many of the traits, tactics, and behaviors listed above, it could be a sign. Fascism is a multi-dimensional ideology that can manifest in various ways but generally includes authoritarianism, extreme nationalism, and a range of tactics aimed at maintaining power. Understanding these signs is crucial for recognizing and combating the rise of fascist ideologies.

Read more

What is fascism? Fascism is a far-right political ideology that emerged in the early 20th century, primarily in Italy under Benito Mussolini. It advocates for a centralized, authoritarian government, often led by a dictatorial figure, and places a strong emphasis on nationalism and, sometimes, racial purity. Fascism rejects liberal democracy, socialism, and communism, instead promoting a form of radical authoritarian ultranationalism. It often involves the suppression of dissent, the glorification of war and violence, and the demonization of perceived enemies, whether they be internal or external.

Historical context of fascism

Fascism gained prominence in the aftermath of World War I, a period marked by social upheaval, economic instability, and a crisis of traditional values. Mussolini’s Italy was the birthplace of fascism, but the ideology found its most extreme and devastating expression in Nazi Germany under Adolf Hitler. The Holocaust, the invasion of multiple countries, and the atrocities committed during World War II, including genocide, are dark chapters directly associated with fascist ideology. After the war, fascism was discredited but not eradicated. Various forms of neo-fascism, far-right, and alt-right ideologies have emerged in different parts of the world, although they often avoid the label of “fascism” due to its historical baggage.

Psychology of adherents

Understanding the psychology of those who adhere to fascist ideologies can be challenging but is crucial for a comprehensive view. Several factors contribute to the appeal of fascism:

  • Social Identity: People often gravitate towards ideologies that offer a strong sense of community and identity. Fascism’s emphasis on nationalism and often ethnocentrism can be attractive to those feeling alienated or marginalized.
  • Economic Insecurity: Fascism often gains traction during times of economic uncertainty. The promise of stability and prosperity can be enticing to those who feel left behind by other political systems.
  • Fear and Prejudice: Fascist ideologies often exploit existing prejudices, whether they be racial (like white nationalism), religious (like Christian nationalism), or otherwise, to create an “us versus them” mentality.
  • Desire for Order: The authoritarian nature of fascism can appeal to those who value social order and are willing to trade off democratic freedoms for promised or perceived safety and stability.
  • Charismatic Leadership: Fascist movements often rely on charismatic leaders who can galvanize public sentiment and offer simplistic solutions to complex problems. So do cults.

What is fascism? Fascism is a far-right ideology that has had a profound impact on global history and continues to exist in various forms today. Its appeal lies in its ability to offer simple solutions to complex problems, often at the expense of individual freedoms and ethical considerations. Understanding the historical and psychological factors that contribute to the rise of fascism is crucial for recognizing and combating it in the modern world — where it is once again on the rise.

Be sure to get familiar with the signs of fascism.

Read more

Fascism is a specific type of authoritarianism. Both are forms of government characterized by tightly centralized power, either under a sole dictatorship / demagogue or a small cadre of rulers — typically of wealthy oligarchs — where rule is absolute and the vast majority of people have little say in policy-making or national events. Identifying authoritarianism vs. fascism isn’t always a clearcut distinction, particularly given that one of the hallmarks of fascism is often that fascist leaders tend to conceal or hide their ideological aims until they achieve power and sometimes even beyond — so as not to alert the public to their true plans until it’s too late for people to fight back.

Under both authoritarianism and fascism, there is little or no political freedom and few (if any) individual rights. Authoritarian governments often use force or coercion to maintain control, dissent is typically suppressed, and political violence is tacitly encouraged so long as it is in support of the ruling regime.

fascists marching in the streets, by Midjourney

Fascism is one type of authoritarian political system

Fascism is a type of authoritarianism with distinct ideological features that emerged in the early 20th century. In addition to the core characteristics of authoritarian government, fascism is typified by extreme nationalism, a belief in the superiority of one’s own race or nation (a form of collective narcissism), and propaganda about both a mythical past and a promised utopian future. The idea of hierarchy is central to fascist mythology, with a core belief in a “natural” social hierarchy that — curiously — must be maintained by force.

Fascist regimes often promote aggressive foreign policies and use violence and intimidation to suppress opposing views. Other key features of fascism include a cult of personality around the leader, a focus on traditional values, and the use of propaganda and disinformation to control public opinion.

Fascist regimes of the 20th century

  1. Italy (1922-1943): Italy was the birthplace of fascism, and under the leadership of Benito Mussolini, it became the first fascist regime in the world. Mussolini and his National Fascist Party came to power in 1922, and ruled Italy as a one-party state until he was deposed in 1943.
  2. Germany (1933-1945): Nazi Germany, led by Adolf Hitler and the National Socialist German Workers’ Party, was a fascist regime that came to power in 1933. The Nazi regime was known for its extreme racism, antisemitism, militarism, and aggressive expansionism, which ultimately led to World War II and the genocide of the Holocaust.
  3. Spain (1939-1975): After a bloody civil war, General Francisco Franco established a fascist dictatorship in Spain in 1939. Franco’s regime was characterized by authoritarianism, repression, and a focus on traditional Catholic values.
  4. Portugal (1932-1974): Portugal was ruled by a fascist regime under the Estado Novo (New State) government, led by Antonio de Oliveira Salazar, from 1932 until 1974. The Estado Novo government was characterized by authoritarianism, nationalism, and corporatism.
  5. Romania (1940-1944): Ion Antonescu, a military dictator and fascist sympathizer, came to power in Romania in 1940. Antonescu’s regime was characterized by anti-Semitism, political repression, and a close alliance with Nazi Germany.
  6. Hungary (1944-1945): Hungary was ruled by a fascist government under Ferenc Szálasi and the Arrow Cross Party from 1944 until the end of World War II. The Arrow Cross regime was known for its extreme anti-Semitism and brutality.
Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini shaking hands in front of a crowd of soldiers, by Midjourney

The cognitive dissonance of fascist ideology

One of the many things I find problematic about fascism’s core belief system is its insistence on enforcing a “natural” social hierarchy. Personally, I find this to be something I call a “self-evident falsehood” — because if the social hierarchy were really natural, it would not require force to maintain it. It would exist in a state of natural equilibrium that does not require the expenditure of effort.

Applying violence and coercion to a population requires a considerable amount of work, and work comes at a cost — a cost factor that is both an unnecessary waste and a destabilizing force acting on society. Those who claim today in America to be upholding the nation’s “original ideals” would do well to remember the self-evident truths we fought a Revolution over: “that all men are created equal.”

Authoritarian regimes in world history

Authoritarianism is an older and more prevalent form of government than fascism, given its origins over 2000 years ago with the Roman Empire. Some of the most notable authoritarian regimes are as follows:

  1. The Roman Empire (27 BC – 476 AD): The Roman Empire was a vast and powerful empire that was ruled by an authoritarian government, after Julius Caesar overthrew the Roman Republic shortly before the turn of the millennium in 27 BC. After his son Octavian emerged victorious from a series of civil wars that followed, a succession of Roman emperors who had almost unlimited power ruled the Empire, and dissent was often suppressed with violence.
  2. The Mongol Empire (1206-1368): The Mongol Empire was one of the largest empires in history, and it was ruled by a series of authoritarian leaders who conquered and subjugated vast territories across Asia, Europe, and the Middle East — most notably Genghis Khan.
  3. The Ottoman Empire (1299-1922): The Ottoman Empire was a vast and powerful Islamic empire that was ruled by a series of sultans who held absolute power over their subjects.
  4. The Soviet Union (1917-1991): The Soviet Union was a communist state that was ruled by the Communist Party and its leaders, including Joseph Stalin. The Soviet regime was characterized by totalitarianism, repression, and the suppression of political dissent.
  5. China under Mao Zedong (1949-1976): Mao Zedong was the founder of the People’s Republic of China and the leader of the Chinese Communist Party. During his rule, China was transformed into a socialist state, but the regime was also characterized by repression, mass killings, and the suppression of political dissent.
  6. North Korea (1948-present): North Korea is a communist state that is ruled by the Workers’ Party of Korea and its leader, currently Kim Jong-un. The North Korean regime is known for its extreme repression, propaganda, and human rights abuses.
Authoritarian regimes like the Soviet Union, by Midjourney

Learn More:

Essential thinkers on authoritarian personality theory ↗

The authoritarian personality is characterized by excessive strictness and a propensity to exhibit oppressive behavior towards perceived subordinates.

American Fascists & the Global Right ↗

The rise of American fascists and right-wing extremism around the world has been a trend for decades.

Authoritarianism Dictionary ↗

This dictionary of authoritarianism collects definitions and charts the recent resurgence of language, ideology, tactics, and rhetoric of authoritarians in America and around the world.

More posts on fascism.

Read more

These days the GOP is just 3 cults in a trenchcoat — nevertheless, it’s helpful to understand some of the ideologies and extremist beliefs that folks on the right engage with. Understanding the psychology can help us make predictions about actions, reactions, and other developments in the political landscape.

What is an ideology?

An ideology is a comprehensive set of beliefs, ideas, and values that shape the way individuals or groups perceive the world and interact within it. It serves as a lens through which people interpret social, political, and economic phenomena, guiding their actions and decisions. Ideologies can be as broad as political doctrines like liberalism, conservatism, or socialism, or as specific as belief systems within a particular culture or organization.

Ideologies often manifest in various forms, such as political platforms, religious doctrines, or social movements. They can be explicit, where the principles are clearly outlined, or implicit, subtly influencing behavior without overt expression. Ideologies are not static; they evolve over time, adapting to new information, social changes, or shifts in power dynamics.

In the realm of politics and governance, ideologies play a crucial role. They inform policy decisions, shape public opinion, and influence the behavior of political actors. They can also be divisive, leading to conflict and exclusion of those who do not conform. In the media, ideologies can affect the framing of news and the dissemination of information, subtly shaping public perception.

Right-wing ideologies

Read more