<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Doctor Paradox &#187; micropayments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://doctorparadox.net/tag/micropayments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://doctorparadox.net</link>
	<description>the metaphysician.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 03:37:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Clay Shirky on the recent resurgence of the micropayments fantasy</title>
		<link>http://doctorparadox.net/2009/02/11/clay-shirky-on-the-recent-resurgence-of-the-micropayments-fantasy/</link>
		<comments>http://doctorparadox.net/2009/02/11/clay-shirky-on-the-recent-resurgence-of-the-micropayments-fantasy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>doctor paradox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internetz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[converstion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[micropayments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web publishing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barb.geeked.org/2009/02/11/clay-shirky-on-the-recent-resurgence-of-the-micropayments-fantasy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Because small payment systems are always discussed in conversations by and for publishers, readers are assigned no independent role. In every micropayments fantasy, there is a sentence or section asserting that what the publishers want will be just fine with us, and, critically, that we will be possessed of no desires of our own that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Because small payment systems are always discussed in conversations by and for publishers, readers are assigned no independent role. In every micropayments fantasy, there is a sentence or section asserting that what the publishers want will be just fine with us, and, critically, that we will be possessed of no desires of our own that would interfere with that fantasy.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, back in the real world, the media business is being turned upside down by our new freedoms and our new roles. We’re not just readers anymore, or listeners or viewers. We’re not customers and we’re certainly not consumers. We’re users. We don’t consume content, we use it, and mostly what we use it for is to support our conversations with one another, because we’re media outlets now too. When I am talking about some event that just happened, whether it’s an earthquake or a basketball game, whether the conversation is in email or Facebook or Twitter, I want to link to what I’m talking about, and I want my friends to be able to read it easily, and to share it with their friends.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.shirky.com/weblog/2009/02/why-small-payments-wont-save-publishers/">Why Small Payments Won’t Save Publishers « Clay Shirky</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://doctorparadox.net/2009/02/11/clay-shirky-on-the-recent-resurgence-of-the-micropayments-fantasy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
